001002272 001__ 1002272
001002272 005__ 20240116084314.0
001002272 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1038/s41380-023-01974-8
001002272 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1359-4184
001002272 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1476-5578
001002272 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2023-01254
001002272 0247_ $$2pmid$$a36782061
001002272 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000930456900004
001002272 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-01254
001002272 082__ $$a610
001002272 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchumer, Maya C.$$b0$$eCorresponding author
001002272 245__ $$aPrefrontal, parietal, and limbic condition-dependent differences in bipolar disorder: a large-scale meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies
001002272 260__ $$aLondon$$bMacmillan$$c2023
001002272 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001002272 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001002272 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1701776383_2513
001002272 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001002272 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001002272 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001002272 520__ $$aBackground: Over the past few decades, neuroimaging research in Bipolar Disorder (BD) has identified neural differences underlying cognitive and emotional processing. However, substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity present across neuroimaging experiments potentially hinders the identification of consistent neural biomarkers of BD. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively reassess brain activation and connectivity in BD in order to identify replicable differences that converge across and within resting-state, cognitive, and emotional neuroimaging experiments.Methods: Neuroimaging experiments (using fMRI, PET, or arterial spin labeling) reporting whole-brain results in adults with BD and controls published from December 1999-June 18, 2019 were identified via PubMed search. Coordinates showing significant activation and/or connectivity differences between BD participants and controls during resting-state, emotional, or cognitive tasks were extracted. Four parallel, independent meta-analyses were calculated using the revised activation likelihood estimation algorithm: all experiment types, all resting-state experiments, all cognitive experiments, and all emotional experiments. To confirm reliability of identified clusters, two different meta-analytic significance tests were employed.Results: 205 published studies yielding 506 individual neuroimaging experiments (150 resting-state, 134 cognitive, 222 emotional) comprising 5745 BD and 8023 control participants were included. Five regions survived both significance tests. Individuals with BD showed functional differences in the right posterior cingulate cortex during resting-state experiments, the left amygdala during emotional experiments, including those using a mixed (positive/negative) valence manipulation, and the left superior and right inferior parietal lobules during cognitive experiments, while hyperactivating the left medial orbitofrontal cortex during cognitive experiments. Across all experiments, there was convergence in the right caudate extending to the ventral striatum, surviving only one significance test.Conclusions: Our findings indicate reproducible localization of prefrontal, parietal, and limbic differences distinguishing BD from control participants that are condition-dependent, despite heterogeneity, and point towards a framework for identifying reproducible differences in BD that may guide diagnosis and treatment.
001002272 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$a5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001002272 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001002272 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aChase, Henry W.$$b1
001002272 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRozovsky, Renata$$b2
001002272 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aEickhoff, Simon B.$$b3$$ufzj
001002272 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPhillips, Mary L.$$b4
001002272 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1502531-7$$a10.1038/s41380-023-01974-8$$p 2826–2838$$tMolecular psychiatry$$v28$$x1359-4184$$y2023
001002272 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1002272/files/s41380-023-01974-8.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001002272 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1002272/files/s41380-023-01974-8.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
001002272 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1002272/files/s41380-023-01974-8.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
001002272 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1002272/files/s41380-023-01974-8.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
001002272 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1002272/files/s41380-023-01974-8.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
001002272 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1002272$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
001002272 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$a Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA$$b0
001002272 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
001002272 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b3
001002272 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001002272 9141_ $$y2023
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2022-11-19
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2022-11-19
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2022-11-19
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2022-11-19$$wger
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001002272 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bMOL PSYCHIATR : 2022$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2023-08-25
001002272 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9910$$2StatID$$aIF >= 10$$bMOL PSYCHIATR : 2022$$d2023-08-25
001002272 920__ $$lyes
001002272 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
001002272 980__ $$ajournal
001002272 980__ $$aVDB
001002272 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001002272 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
001002272 9801_ $$aFullTexts