001     1005151
005     20240709082149.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1109/OSMSES54027.2022.9769104
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:000852742000007
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-01339
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Holtwerth, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)180106
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
111 2 _ |a 1st International Workshop on Open Source Modelling and Simulation of Energy Systems
|g OSMSES2022
|c Aachen
|d 2022-04-04 - 2022-04-05
|w Germany
245 _ _ |a Data-Driven Generation of Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Formulations for Model Predictive Control of Hybrid Energy Storage Systems using detailed nonlinear Simulation Models
250 _ _ |a 1st
260 _ _ |c 2022
300 _ _ |a 160-69
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_PAPER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Paper
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Contribution to a conference proceedings
|b contrib
|m contrib
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)8
|s 1677647732_17431
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
520 _ _ |a The scheduling of hybrid energy systems with battery storage systems (BSS) and hydrogen storage systems (HSS) for the storage of renewable energies is a non-trivial task due to the nonlinear nature of electrolyzers and fuel cells and the volatile electricity generation by renewable energies. Mathematical optimization of the scheduling increases the system efficiency and decreases the share of grid electricity required to cover the electrical demand. Hence, tailor-made models are required for each hydrogen component due to the uniqueness of each hydrogen system. Therefore, the time-consuming work of model generation and validation needs to be done for every system in order to ensure adequate accuracy of the mathematical models used for model predictive control. This work derives and utilizes a simulation model of a hybrid energy system as a substitute for a real-world system. We propose a framework that uses functional mock-up units of detailed simulation models to derive tailormade mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulations of the steady-state operational behavior. We combine the derived formulations for the operational behavior of each component into an optimization model of the whole hybrid energy system. The optimization model is then used for model predictive control of the simulation model. The results show that we can generate accuratemodels of the component behavior without detailed knowledge of the simulation model. The resulting optimization model of the whole energy system accurately reflects the simulation model and is, therefore, suitable for model predictive control.
536 _ _ |a 1123 - Smart Areas and Research Platforms (POF4-112)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1123
|c POF4-112
|f POF IV
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Xhonneux, André
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)8457
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Müller, Dirk
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)172026
|b 2
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1109/OSMSES54027.2022.9769104
909 C O |p VDB
|o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1005151
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)180106
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)8457
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)172026
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-112
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Digitalisierung und Systemtechnik
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1123
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217
|k IEK-10
|l Modellierung von Energiesystemen
|x 0
980 _ _ |a contrib
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21