Home > Publications database > Learning to Live with Strange Error: Beyond Trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence Ethics > print |
001 | 1005478 | ||
005 | 20231027114358.0 | ||
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1017/S0963180122000688 |2 doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 0963-1801 |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 1469-2147 |2 ISSN |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-01494 |2 datacite_doi |
024 | 7 | _ | |a 36621773 |2 pmid |
024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000911204600001 |2 WOS |
037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2023-01494 |
082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
100 | 1 | _ | |a Rathkopf, Charles |0 P:(DE-Juel1)176538 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
245 | _ | _ | |a Learning to Live with Strange Error: Beyond Trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence Ethics |
260 | _ | _ | |c 2023 |b Cambridge University Press |
336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1692950260_15832 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
520 | _ | _ | |a Position papers on artificial intelligence (AI) ethics are often framed as attempts to work out technical and regulatory strategies for attaining what is commonly called trustworthy AI. In such papers, the technical and regulatory strategies are frequently analyzed in detail, but the concept of trustworthy AI is not. As a result, it remains unclear. This paper lays out a variety of possible interpretations of the concept and concludes that none of them is appropriate. The central problem is that, by framing the ethics of AI in terms of trustworthiness, we reinforce unjustified anthropocentric assumptions that stand in the way of clear analysis. Furthermore, even if we insist on a purely epistemic interpretation of the concept, according to which trustworthiness just means measurable reliability, it turns out that the analysis will, nevertheless, suffer from a subtle form of anthropocentrism. The paper goes on to develop the concept of strange error, which serves both to sharpen the initial diagnosis of the inadequacy of trustworthy AI and to articulate the novel epistemological situation created by the use of AI. The paper concludes with a discussion of how strange error puts pressure on standard practices of assessing moral culpability, particularly in the context of medicine. |
536 | _ | _ | |a 5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255 |c POF4-525 |f POF IV |x 0 |
588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
700 | 1 | _ | |a Heinrichs, Bert |0 P:(DE-Juel1)166268 |b 1 |
773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1017/S0963180122000688 |g p. 1 - 13 |0 PERI:(DE-600)1499985-7 |p 1 - 13 |t Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics |v - |y 2023 |x 0963-1801 |
856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1005478/files/Invoice_APC600372580.pdf |
856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1005478/files/learning-to-live-with-strange-error-beyond-trustworthiness-in-artificial-intelligence-ethics.pdf |
909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1005478 |p openaire |p open_access |p OpenAPC |p driver |p VDB |p openCost |p dnbdelivery |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)176538 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)166268 |
910 | 1 | _ | |a Uni Bonn |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)166268 |
913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255 |x 0 |
914 | 1 | _ | |y 2023 |
915 | p | c | |a APC keys set |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000 |2 APC |
915 | p | c | |a Local Funding |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001 |2 APC |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2022-11-23 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2022-11-23 |
915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |d 2023-10-21 |w ger |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1180 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130 |2 StatID |b Social Sciences Citation Index |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b CAMB Q HEALTHC ETHIC : 2022 |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2023-10-21 |
915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2023-10-21 |
920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |k INM-7 |l Gehirn & Verhalten |x 0 |
980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |
980 | _ | _ | |a APC |
980 | 1 | _ | |a APC |
980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
---|