001005735 001__ 1005735
001005735 005__ 20240116084314.0
001005735 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3758/s13414-023-02660-1
001005735 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1943-3921
001005735 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0031-5117
001005735 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1532-5962
001005735 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1943-393X
001005735 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2023-01607
001005735 0247_ $$2pmid$$a36949260
001005735 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000957512200001
001005735 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-01607
001005735 082__ $$a150
001005735 1001_ $$00000-0002-5256-5623$$aHarris, J. W. C.$$b0$$eFirst author
001005735 245__ $$aThe role of line-orientation processing in the production of the Poggendorff illusion: A dual-task study
001005735 260__ $$aNew York, NY$$bSpringer$$c2023
001005735 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001005735 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001005735 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1701179001_28677
001005735 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001005735 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001005735 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001005735 520__ $$aUsing a dual-task paradigm, the present investigation examined whether processes related to line orientation play a critical role in the production of the Poggendorff illusion. In Experiment 1, we assessed the magnitude of the Poggendorff illusion under three different task conditions. In the single-task condition, participants were asked to report how they perceive the alignment of transversal lines in the Poggendorff figure. In two different dual-task conditions, the participants were asked to read aloud the time displayed on a digital or analogue clock while also performing the Poggendorff perception task. The method of constant stimuli was used to calculate the point of subjective equality (PSE) and bistability width values, which represent illusion strength and perceptual uncertainty, respectively. PSEs indicated that the magnitude of the illusion did not vary between single, dual-analogue, and dual-digital task conditions, which suggests that the additional demands placed by the dual tasks had no effect on the illusion strength. Perceptual uncertainty and clock-reading errors were greater in the dual-analogue task condition. Experiment 2 revealed that the analogue clockface was more difficult to read than the digital clockface. Based on these results, we conclude that having participants perform a secondary task does not influence the magnitude of the Poggendorff illusion.
001005735 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001005735 536__ $$0G:(GEPRIS)491111487$$aDFG project 491111487 - Open-Access-Publikationskosten / 2022 - 2024 / Forschungszentrum Jülich (OAPKFZJ) (491111487)$$c491111487$$x1
001005735 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001005735 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)190278$$aYildiz, G. Y.$$b1
001005735 7001_ $$00000-0001-9817-0689$$aChouinard, P. A.$$b2$$eCorresponding author
001005735 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2480891-X$$a10.3758/s13414-023-02660-1$$gVol. 85, no. 6, p. 2033 - 2045$$n6$$p2033 - 2045$$tAttention, perception, & psychophysics$$v85$$x1943-3921$$y2023
001005735 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1005735/files/s13414-023-02660-1.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001005735 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1005735/files/s13414-023-02660-1.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
001005735 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1005735/files/s13414-023-02660-1.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
001005735 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1005735/files/s13414-023-02660-1.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
001005735 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1005735/files/s13414-023-02660-1.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
001005735 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1005735$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
001005735 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)190278$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
001005735 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001005735 9141_ $$y2023
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bATTEN PERCEPT PSYCHO : 2022$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2023-08-25$$wger
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0020$$2StatID$$aNo Peer Review$$bASC$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-08-25
001005735 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-08-25
001005735 920__ $$lyes
001005735 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
001005735 980__ $$ajournal
001005735 980__ $$aVDB
001005735 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001005735 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
001005735 9801_ $$aFullTexts