% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ishimoto:1007620,
author = {Ishimoto, Yuki and Wulf, Christina and Schonhoff, Andreas
and Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm},
title = {{L}ife cycle costing approaches of fuel cell and hydrogen
systems: {A} literature review},
journal = {International journal of hydrogen energy},
volume = {54},
issn = {0360-3199},
address = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-02119},
pages = {361-374},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Hydrogen is a versatile energy carrier which can be
produced from variety of feedstocks, stored and transported
in various forms for multi-functional end-uses in
transportation, energy and manufacturing sectors. Several
regional, national and supra-national climate policy
frameworks emphasize the need, value and importance of Fuel
cell and Hydrogen (FCH) technologies for deep and
sector-wide decarbonization. Despite these multi-faceted
advantages, familiar and proven FCH technologies such as
alkaline electrolysis and proton-exchange membrane fuel cell
(PEMFC) often face economic, technical and societal barriers
to mass-market adoption. There is no single, unified,
standardized, and globally harmonized normative definition
of costs. Nevertheless, the discussion and debates
surrounding plausible candidates and/or constituents
integral for assessing the economics and value proposition
of status-quo as well as developmental FCH technologies are
steadily increasing—Life Cycle Costing (LCC) being one of
them, if not the most important outcome of such exercises.To
that end, this review article seeks to improve our
collective understanding of LCC of FCH technologies by
scrutinizing close to a few hundred publications drawn from
representative databases—SCOPUS and Web of Science
encompassing several tens of technologies for production and
select transportation, storage and end-user utilization
cases. This comprehensive review forms part of and serves as
the basis for the Clean Hydrogen Partnership funded SH2E
project, whose ultimate goal is the methodical development a
formal set of principles and guardrails for evaluating the
economic, environmental and social impacts of FCH
technologies. Additionally, the SH2E projects will also
facilitate the proper comparison of different FCH
technologies whilst reconciling range of technologies,
methodologies, modelling assumptions, and parameterization
found in existing literature.},
cin = {IEK-STE},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
pnm = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
(POF4-111) / SH2E - Sustainability Assessment of Harmonised
Hydrogen Energy Systems: Guidelines for Life Cycle
Sustainability Assessment and Prospective Benchmarking
(101007163)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112 / G:(EU-Grant)101007163},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:001141522500001},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.04.035},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1007620},
}