001     1007626
005     20230929112531.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104884
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0950-3293
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-6343
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/34455
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:001002043300001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-02125
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 660
100 1 _ |a Macht, Janine
|0 0000-0003-2121-7535
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Eco-friendly alternatives to food packed in plastics: German consumers’ purchase intentions for different bio-based packaging strategies
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam
|c 2023
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1684910682_12536
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Growing concern about the environmental consequences of plastic packaging has led to the development of strategies that discourage single-use fossil-based plastic packaging and promote sustainable bio-based alternatives. Nevertheless, it is unclear how different bio-based packaging strategies are perceived by consumers. Research suggests an ambivalent relationship regarding bioplastics and a positive perception of paper. In this study, we investigated how consumers’ purchase intentions differ for two bio-based packaging alternatives—bioplastic and paper—in comparison to recyclable fossil-based plastic packaging for three products: fresh soft fruits, margarine/butter, and vegetable oil. Moreover, we explored the mediating roles of perceived eco-friendliness and perceived convenience and tested the moderation effect of green consumption values. In total, 2755 German consumers completed an online survey with a 3x3 between-subjects design in January 2022. The findings show that consumers’ purchase intentions differed between different packaging types and products. The higher consumers perceived the eco-friendliness of the packaging, the higher their purchase intention. This effect was stronger for people with higher green consumption values. While paper-based food packaging was perceived as most eco-friendly, it was not always perceived as convenient, and may therefore lead to rejection. For fresh soft fruits, paper-based packaging appears to be the best solution for consumers. For vegetable oil, the bioplastic option received the highest purchase intention. Nevertheless, there are product categories—such as margarine/butter—where the benefits of bio-based packaging are not obvious to consumers and should therefore be communicated clearly.
536 _ _ |a 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Klink-Lehmann, Jeanette
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Venghaus, Sandra
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)164476
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104884
|g Vol. 109, p. 104884 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2013024-7
|p 104884 -
|t Food quality and preference
|v 109
|y 2023
|x 0950-3293
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1007626/files/Macht%20et%20al.%202023_FQP_accepted.pdf
|y Published on 2023-05-13. Available in OpenAccess from 2024-05-13.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1007626
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)164476
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-23
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-23
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-22
|w ger
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b FOOD QUAL PREFER : 2022
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b FOOD QUAL PREFER : 2022
|d 2023-08-22
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21