001     1007692
005     20240226075321.0
024 7 _ |a 2128/34555
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-02166
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Sarma, Rakesh
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)188513
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
111 2 _ |a 33rd International Conference on Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics
|g ParCFD2022
|c Alba
|d 2022-05-25 - 2022-05-27
|w Italy
245 _ _ |a Parallel and Scalable Deep Learning to Reconstruct Actuated Turbulent Boundary Layer Flows. Part I: Investigation of Autoencoder-Based Trainings
260 _ _ |c 2022
300 _ _ |a 4 pages
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_PAPER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Paper
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Contribution to a conference proceedings
|b contrib
|m contrib
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)8
|s 1687325830_18222
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
520 _ _ |a With the availability of large datasets and increasing high-performance computing resources, machine learning tools offer many opportunities to improve and/or augment numerical methods used in the field of computational fluid dynamics. A low-dimensional representation of a turbulent boundary layer flow field is generated by a plain and a physics-contrained autoencoder. The training makes use of a distributed learning environment. The average test error of the plain autoencoder is ~4.4 times smaller than the error of the physics-constrained autoencoder although the latter integrates physical laws in the training process. Furthermore, after 1,000 epochs, the training loss of the physics-constrained autoencoder is ~9.1 times higher than the plain autoencoder after 300 epochs. The neural network corresponding to the plain autoencoder is able to provide accurate reconstructions of a turbulent boundary layer flow.
536 _ _ |a 5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|c POF4-511
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a RAISE - Research on AI- and Simulation-Based Engineering at Exascale (951733)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)951733
|c 951733
|f H2020-INFRAEDI-2019-1
|x 1
700 1 _ |a Albers, Marian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Inanc, Eray
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)188268
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Aach, Marcel
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)180916
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Schröder, Wolfgang
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Lintermann, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165948
|b 5
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1007692/files/2022_ParCFD_Abstract_Sarma.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1007692
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)188513
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)188268
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)180916
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165948
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Engineering Digital Futures – Supercomputing, Data Management and Information Security for Knowledge and Action
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-510
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-511
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Enabling Computational- & Data-Intensive Science and Engineering
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
|k JSC
|l Jülich Supercomputing Center
|x 0
980 _ _ |a contrib
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21