001     1008648
005     20240712100852.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/acp-23-6591-2023
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1680-7316
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1680-7324
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-02449
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:001010623000001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-02449
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a von Hobe, Marc
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129170
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Comment on “An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide” by Quaglia et al. (2022)
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2023
|b EGU
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1688546940_13394
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Solar radiation management through artificially increasing the amount of stratospheric sulfate aerosol is being considered as a possible climate engineering method. To overcome the challenge of transporting the necessary amount of sulfur to the stratosphere, Quaglia and co-workers suggest deliberate emissions of carbonyl sulfide (OCS), a long-lived precursor of atmospheric sulfate. In their paper, published in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics in 2022, they outline two scenarios with OCS emissions either at the Earth's surface or in the tropical upper troposphere and calculate the expected radiative forcing using a climate model. In our opinion, the study (i) neglects a significantly higher surface uptake that will inevitably be induced by the elevated atmospheric OCS concentrations and (ii) overestimates the net cooling effect of this OCS geoengineering approach due to some questionable parameterizations and assumptions in the radiative forcing calculations. In this commentary, we use state-of-the-art models to show that at the mean atmospheric OCS mixing ratios of the two emissions scenarios, the terrestrial biosphere and the oceans are expected to take up more OCS than is being released to reach these levels. Using chemistry climate models with a long-standing record for estimating the climate forcing of OCS and stratospheric aerosols, we also show that the net radiative forcing of the emission scenarios suggested by Quaglia and co-workers is smaller than suggested and insufficient to offset any significant portion of anthropogenically induced climate change. Our conclusion is that a geoengineering approach using OCS will not work under any circumstances and should not be considered further.
536 _ _ |a 2112 - Climate Feedbacks (POF4-211)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112
|c POF4-211
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Brühl, Christoph
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Lennartz, Sinikka T.
|0 0000-0001-7040-149X
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Whelan, Mary E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Kaushik, Aleya
|0 0000-0002-2516-8454
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/acp-23-6591-2023
|g Vol. 23, no. 11, p. 6591 - 6598
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1
|n 11
|p 6591 - 6598
|t Atmospheric chemistry and physics
|v 23
|y 2023
|x 1680-7316
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1008648/files/receipt_Helmholtz-PUC-2023-51.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1008648/files/acp-23-6591-2023.pdf
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1008648
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129170
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-211
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Die Atmosphäre im globalen Wandel
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-03-30
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-03-30
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-03-30
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-03-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Open peer review
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2022
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2022
|d 2023-08-23
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
|k IEK-7
|l Stratosphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21