001009243 001__ 1009243
001009243 005__ 20250129092410.0
001009243 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2023-02705
001009243 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-02705
001009243 041__ $$aEnglish
001009243 088__ $$2Other$$a4441
001009243 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)173093$$aScherer, Benedikt$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
001009243 245__ $$aEvaluation of Line Detection Methods for the Analysis of Charge Stability Diagrams
001009243 260__ $$aJülich$$bForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag$$c2023
001009243 300__ $$aIX, 64
001009243 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$areport
001009243 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aREPORT
001009243 3367_ $$010$$2EndNote$$aReport
001009243 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)3$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aBook$$mbook
001009243 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Report
001009243 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)29$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aReport$$breport$$mreport$$s1689566493_20054
001009243 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aTECHREPORT
001009243 4900_ $$aBerichte des Forschungszentrums Jülich$$v4441
001009243 520__ $$aThe various approaches for the implementation of qubits are objects of ongoing research. One approach uses the spin states of electrons that are confined in double quantum dots. For the calibration of such a qubit, charge stability diagrams (CSDs) are measured and analyzed. They constitute the changes in dependence on the voltages of two electrodes and, thus, can be represented as grayscale images. The voltages at which electrons tunnel in or out of the quantum dots correspond to line structures in the CSD images. Therefore, the automatic detection of lines in CSD images plays an important role in the qubit calibration process. Various line detection methods are explored in this thesis. Since edge detection is a substep employed by several line detectors, a selection of edge detection methods is explored as well. Additionally, postprocessing methods for the validation, grouping, and merging of lines and the segmentation of infinite lines into finite line segments are investigated. This thesis focuses on traditional approaches as opposed to approaches based on machine learning. Two methods are proposed for the automatic evaluation of the detection results. Both methods function by comparing the detections against a manually labeled ground truth data set. The first method evaluates edge maps by comparing the individual edge pixels with the pixels corresponding to the ground truth lines. The second method benchmarks the detected lines against the ground truth lines. Using these evaluation methods, the free parameters of the edge detectors, line detectors, and postprocessing methods are optimized. The detection results of the methods are evaluated and compared for four data setsof varying quality. Additionally, the implications of the detection quality for the analysis of CSDs are explained.
001009243 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5223$$a5223 - Quantum-Computer Control Systems and Cryoelectronics (POF4-522)$$cPOF4-522$$fPOF IV$$x0
001009243 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1009243/files/J%C3%BCl%204441_Scherer%2C%20Benedikt.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001009243 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1009243$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
001009243 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)173093$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001009243 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-522$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5223$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vQuantum Computing$$x0
001009243 9141_ $$y2023
001009243 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001009243 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001009243 920__ $$lyes
001009243 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-2-20090406$$kZEA-2$$lZentralinstitut für Elektronik$$x0
001009243 9801_ $$aFullTexts
001009243 980__ $$areport
001009243 980__ $$aVDB
001009243 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001009243 980__ $$abook
001009243 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-2-20090406
001009243 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)PGI-4-20110106