001     1009393
005     20240313094859.0
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-02797
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Ito, Junji
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144576
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
111 2 _ |a 32nd Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting
|g CNS2023
|c Leipzig
|d 2023-07-15 - 2023-07-19
|w Germany
245 _ _ |a Towards classification of spatio-temporal wave patterns based on principal component analysis
260 _ _ |c 2023
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a Other
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a LECTURE_SPEECH
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Conference Presentation
|b conf
|m conf
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)6
|s 1690260952_7833
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x After Call
520 _ _ |a Spatio-temporal oscillatory dynamics are found in a variety of subjects in the natural sciences. [1]They are mathematically described in terms of a complex-valued field variable Z(r, t), from whichone can uniquely derive the oscillation amplitude A(r, t) = |Z(r, t)| and oscillation phase θ(r, t) = argZ(r, t), as functions of location r and time t. In a wide class of systems, the phase variable exhibitsspecific spatio-temporal patterns, such as planar wave, radial wave, rotating wave, and so on.These patterns have also been observed in the cerebral cortex of the brain as spatio-temporal waves(STWs) of local field potential (LFP) signals [2-5]. Previous studies have suggested that specific phasepatterns, in particular planar waves, are related to the coordination of spiking activity of singleneurons, and therefore might play a fundamental role in neuronal information processing [6-8].Studying the implications of the STWs for brain function requires a systematic classification methodto group given phase patterns into distinct wave types (e.g. planar, radial, and rotating). Thestrategies taken in previous studies rely on defining a characteristic measure quantifying a feature ofthe phase variable θ(r, t) for each wave type, and setting a threshold on this measure to assign awave type to an episode of data. An inherent shortcoming of this approach is that it requires the adhoc and eventually arbitrary selection of characteristic measures and thresholds.Here we propose a method to quantify phase pattern characteristics based on principal componentanalysis (PCA), which can be used for a non-parametric classification of wave types. In addition tothe standard PCA, we also employ the complex PCA, which works on a complex-valued data matrixand decompose it into components represented by complex-valued vectors (see Figure). We showthat the principal components (PCs) obtained via the complex PCA can naturally represent phaserelationships among variables. We apply both methods to Utah array recordings of LFPs from themacaque motor cortex, which has been reported to exhibit various types of wave patterns, anddiscuss the commonalities and differences between the PCs obtained by the two methods.Furthermore, we relate the time course of the obtained PCs to the time course of the characteristicmeasures of wave types, which were used in previous studies, and examine how individual PCscorrespond to one or multiple of the characteristic measures.We thereby employ the phase pattern quantification with (the standard or complex) PCA as analternative method of wave type classification. Further, decomposing the cortical waves into“eigenmodes” and studying their relations to neuronal and behavioral covariates would provide apromising approach for investigating the functional implications of the waves.References1. Winfree (1980) The geometry of biological time. Vol. 2.2. Ermentrout et al. (2001) Neuron 29(1):33–44. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00178-73. Heitmann et al. (2012) Front. Comput. Neurosci. 6:67. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.000674. Denker et al. (2018) Sci. Rep. 8(1):5200. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22990-75. Townsend et al. (2018) PLoS CB 14(12):e1006643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.10066436. Takahashi et al. (2015) Nat. Commun. 6(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/ncomms81697. Vinck and Bosman (2016) Front. Syst. Neurosci. 10:35. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.000358. Davis et al. (2020) Nat. Commun. 12(1):6057. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26175-1
536 _ _ |a 5231 - Neuroscientific Foundations (POF4-523)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5231
|c POF4-523
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)785907
|c 785907
|f H2020-SGA-FETFLAG-HBP-2017
|x 1
536 _ _ |a HBP SGA3 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 3 (945539)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)945539
|c 945539
|f H2020-SGA-FETFLAG-HBP-2019
|x 2
536 _ _ |a HAF - Helmholtz Analytics Framework (ZT-I-0003)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)ZT-I-0003
|c ZT-I-0003
|x 3
536 _ _ |a JL SMHB - Joint Lab Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain (JL SMHB-2021-2027)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)JL SMHB-2021-2027
|c JL SMHB-2021-2027
|x 4
536 _ _ |a Algorithms of Adaptive Behavior and their Neuronal Implementation in Health and Disease (iBehave-20220812)
|0 G:(DE-Juel-1)iBehave-20220812
|c iBehave-20220812
|x 5
700 1 _ |a Gutzen, Robin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171572
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Krauße, Sven
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)192414
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Denker, Michael
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144807
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Grün, Sonja
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144168
|b 4
|u fzj
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1009393
|p openaire
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144576
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171572
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)192414
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144807
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144168
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-523
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Neuromorphic Computing and Network Dynamics
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5231
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
|k INM-6
|l Computational and Systems Neuroscience
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
|k IAS-6
|l Theoretical Neuroscience
|x 1
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
|k INM-10
|l Jara-Institut Brain structure-function relationships
|x 2
980 _ _ |a conf
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21