% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wolfrum:1010146,
author = {Wolfrum, Vera and Lehner, Katharina and Heim, Stefan and
Ziegler, Wolfram},
title = {{C}linical {A}ssessment of {C}ommunication-{R}elated
{S}peech {P}arameters in {D}ysarthria: {T}he {I}mpact of
{P}erceptual {A}daptation},
journal = {Journal of speech, language, and hearing research},
volume = {66},
number = {8},
issn = {1092-4388},
address = {Rockville, Md.},
publisher = {American Speech-Language-Hearing Assoc.},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-02974},
pages = {2622 - 2642},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Purpose: In current clinical practice, intelligibility of
dysarthric speech is commonly assessed by speech-language
therapists (SLTs), in most cases by the therapist caring for
the patient being diagnosed. Since SLTs are familiar with
dysarthria in general and with the speech of the individual
patient to be assessed in particular, they have an
adaptation advantage in understanding the patient's
utterances. We examined whether and how listeners'
assessments of communication-related speech parameters vary
as a function of their familiarity with dysarthria in
general and with the diagnosed patients in
particular.Method: Intelligibility, speech naturalness, and
perceived listener effort were assessed in 20 persons with
dysarthria (PWD). Patients' speech samples were judged by
the individual treating therapists, five dysarthria experts
who were unfamiliar with the patients, and crowdsourced
naïve listeners. Adaptation effects were analyzed using (a)
linear mixed models of overall scoring levels, (b)
regression models of severity dependence, (c) network
analyses of between-listener and between-parameter
relationships, and (d) measures of intra- and interobserver
consistency.Results: Significant advantages of dysarthria
experts over laypeople were found in all parameters. An
overall advantage of the treating therapists over
nonfamiliar experts was only seen in listening effort.
Severity-dependent adaptation effects occurred in all
parameters. The therapists' responses were heterogeneous and
inconsistent with those of the unfamiliar experts and the
naïve listeners.Conclusions: The way SLTs evaluate
communication-relevant speech parameters of the PWD whom
they care for is influenced not only by adaptation benefits
but also by therapeutic biases. This finding weakens the
validity of assessments of communication-relevant speech
parameters by the treating therapists themselves and
encourages the development and use of alternative methods.},
cin = {INM-1},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {37486782},
UT = {WOS:001056733600005},
doi = {10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00105},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1010146},
}