001010151 001__ 1010151
001010151 005__ 20231102104927.0
001010151 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/soil-9-365-2023
001010151 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2199-3971
001010151 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2199-398X
001010151 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2023-02979
001010151 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001021655700001
001010151 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-02979
001010151 082__ $$a550
001010151 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGuillaume, Benjamin$$b0$$eCorresponding author
001010151 245__ $$aReproducibility of the wet part of the soil water retention curve: a European interlaboratory comparison
001010151 260__ $$aGöttingen$$bCopernicus Publ.$$c2023
001010151 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001010151 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001010151 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1692359212_8450
001010151 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001010151 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001010151 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001010151 520__ $$aThe soil water retention curve (SWRC) is a key soil property required for predicting basic hydrological processes. The SWRC is often obtained in the laboratory with non-harmonized methods. Moreover, procedures associated with each method are not standardized. This can induce a lack of reproducibility between laboratories using different methods and procedures or using the same methods with different procedures. The goal of this study was to estimate the inter- and intralaboratory variability of the measurement of the wet part (from 10 to 300 hPa) of the SWRC. An interlaboratory comparison was carried out between 14 laboratories, using artificially constructed, porous reference samples that were transferred between laboratories according to a statistical design. The retention measurements were modelled by a series of linear mixed models using a Bayesian approach. This allowed the detection of sample-to-sample variability, interlaboratory variability, intralaboratory variability and the effects of sample changes between measurements. The greatest portion of the differences in the measurement of SWRCs was due to interlaboratory variability. The intralaboratory variability was highly variable depending on the laboratory. Some laboratories successfully reproduced the same SWRC on the same sample, while others did not. The mean intralaboratory variability over all laboratories was smaller than the mean interlaboratory variability. A possible explanation for these results is that all laboratories used slightly different methods and procedures. We believe that this result may be of great importance regarding the quality of SWRC databases built by pooling SWRCs obtained in different laboratories. The quality of pedotransfer functions or maps that might be derived is probably hampered by this inter- and intralaboratory variability. The way forward is that measurement procedures of the SWRC need to be harmonized and standardized.
001010151 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
001010151 588__ $$aDataset connected to DataCite
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAroui Boukbida, Hanane$$b1
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBakker, Gerben$$b2
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBieganowski, Andrzej$$b3
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBrostaux, Yves$$b4
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCornelis, Wim$$b5
001010151 7001_ $$00000-0002-9543-1318$$aDurner, Wolfgang$$b6
001010151 7001_ $$00000-0003-1172-981X$$aHartmann, Christian$$b7
001010151 7001_ $$00000-0002-2276-0233$$aIversen, Bo V.$$b8
001010151 7001_ $$aJavaux, Mathieu$$b9
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aIngwersen, Joachim$$b10
001010151 7001_ $$00000-0001-9678-541X$$aLamorski, Krzysztof$$b11
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLamparter, Axel$$b12
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMakó, András$$b13
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMingot Soriano, Ana María$$b14
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMessing, Ingmar$$b15
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aNemes, Attila$$b16
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPomes-Bordedebat, Alexandre$$b17
001010151 7001_ $$00000-0002-3172-7339$$avan der Ploeg, Martine$$b18
001010151 7001_ $$00000-0002-3448-5208$$aWeber, Tobias Karl David$$b19
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129553$$aWeihermüller, Lutz$$b20
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWellens, Joost$$b21
001010151 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDegré, Aurore$$b22
001010151 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2834892-8$$a10.5194/soil-9-365-2023$$gVol. 9, no. 1, p. 365 - 379$$n1$$p365 - 379$$tSoil$$v9$$x2199-3971$$y2023
001010151 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1010151/files/soil-9-365-2023.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001010151 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1010151$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
001010151 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2022-11-08
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2022-11-08
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2022-11-08
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2022-11-08
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2022-12-20T08:54:27Z
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2022-12-20T08:54:27Z
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Open peer review$$d2022-12-20T08:54:27Z
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bSOIL-GERMANY : 2022$$d2023-10-26
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-10-26
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-10-26
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-10-26
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2023-10-26
001010151 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bSOIL-GERMANY : 2022$$d2023-10-26
001010151 9141_ $$y2023
001010151 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129553$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b20$$kFZJ
001010151 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
001010151 920__ $$lyes
001010151 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
001010151 980__ $$ajournal
001010151 980__ $$aVDB
001010151 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001010151 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
001010151 980__ $$aOPENSCIENCE
001010151 9801_ $$aFullTexts