001014302 001__ 1014302
001014302 005__ 20240109115056.0
001014302 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023
001014302 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1027-5606
001014302 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1607-7938
001014302 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2023-03225
001014302 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001116760800001
001014302 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-03225
001014302 082__ $$a550
001014302 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)178050$$aBoas, Theresa$$b0$$eCorresponding author
001014302 245__ $$aSeasonal soil moisture and crop yield prediction with fifth-generation seasonal forecasting system (SEAS5) long-range meteorological forecasts in a land surface modelling approach
001014302 260__ $$aMunich$$bEGU$$c2023
001014302 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001014302 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001014302 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1694596787_18147
001014302 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001014302 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001014302 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001014302 520__ $$aLong-range weather forecasts provide predictions of atmospheric, ocean and land surface conditions that can potentially be used in land surface and hydrological models to predict the water and energy status of the land surface or in crop growth models to predict yield for water resources or agricultural planning. However, the coarse spatial and temporal resolutions of available forecast products have hindered their widespread use in such modelling applications, which usually require high-resolution input data. In this study, we applied sub-seasonal (up to 4 months) and seasonal (7 months) weather forecasts from the latest European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) seasonal forecasting system (SEAS5) in a land surface modelling approach using the Community Land Model version 5.0 (CLM5). Simulations were conducted for 2017–2020 forced with sub-seasonal and seasonal weather forecasts over two different domains with contrasting climate and cropping conditions: the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia (DE-NRW) and the Australian state of Victoria (AUS-VIC). We found that, after pre-processing of the forecast products (i.e. temporal downscaling of precipitation and incoming short-wave radiation), the simulations forced with seasonal and sub-seasonal forecasts were able to provide a model output that was very close to the reference simulation results forced by reanalysis data (the mean annual crop yield showed maximum differences of 0.28 and 0.36 t ha−1 for AUS-VIC and DE-NRW respectively). Differences between seasonal and sub-seasonal experiments were insignificant. The forecast experiments were able to satisfactorily capture recorded inter-annual variations of crop yield. In addition, they also reproduced the generally higher inter-annual differences in crop yield across the AUS-VIC domain (approximately 50 % inter-annual differences in recorded yields and up to 17 % inter-annual differences in simulated yields) compared to the DE-NRW domain (approximately 15 % inter-annual differences in recorded yields and up to 5 % in simulated yields). The high- and low-yield seasons (2020 and 2018) among the 4 simulated years were clearly reproduced in the forecast simulation results. Furthermore, sub-seasonal and seasonal simulations reflected the early harvest in the drought year of 2018 in the DE-NRW domain. However, simulated inter-annual yield variability was lower in all simulations compared to the official statistics. While general soil moisture trends, such as the European drought in 2018, were captured by the seasonal experiments, we found systematic overestimations and underestimations in both the forecast and reference simulations compared to the Soil Moisture Active Passive Level-3 soil moisture product (SMAP L3) and the Soil Moisture Climate Change Initiative Combined dataset from the European Space Agency (ESA CCI). These observed biases of soil moisture and the low inter-annual differences in simulated crop yield indicate the need to improve the representation of these variables in CLM5 to increase the model sensitivity to drought stress and other crop stressors.
001014302 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
001014302 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001014302 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129440$$aBogena, Heye Reemt$$b1
001014302 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRyu, Dongryeol$$b2
001014302 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b3
001014302 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWestern, Andrew$$b4
001014302 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHendricks Franssen, Harrie-Jan$$b5
001014302 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2100610-6$$a10.5194/hess-27-3143-2023$$gVol. 27, no. 16, p. 3143 - 3167$$n16$$p3143 - 3167$$tHydrology and earth system sciences$$v27$$x1027-5606$$y2023
001014302 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1014302/files/Invoice_Helmholtz-PUC-2023-74.pdf
001014302 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1014302/files/hess-27-3143-2023.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001014302 8767_ $$8Helmholtz-PUC-2023-74$$92023-08-29$$a1200196094$$d2023-08-31$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt$$v427.50
001014302 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1014302$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
001014302 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)178050$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001014302 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129440$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
001014302 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
001014302 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
001014302 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
001014302 9141_ $$y2023
001014302 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0000$$2APC$$aAPC keys set
001014302 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0001$$2APC$$aLocal Funding
001014302 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0002$$2APC$$aDFG OA Publikationskosten
001014302 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0003$$2APC$$aDOAJ Journal
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2022-11-17
001014302 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2022-11-17
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2022-11-17
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2022-11-17
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2022-12-20T09:33:05Z
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2022-12-20T09:33:05Z
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Open peer review$$d2022-12-20T09:33:05Z
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-10-25
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-10-25
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-10-25
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2023-10-25
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bHYDROL EARTH SYST SC : 2022$$d2023-10-25
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-10-25
001014302 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bHYDROL EARTH SYST SC : 2022$$d2023-10-25
001014302 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
001014302 980__ $$ajournal
001014302 980__ $$aVDB
001014302 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001014302 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
001014302 980__ $$aAPC
001014302 9801_ $$aAPC
001014302 9801_ $$aFullTexts