001     1014378
005     20240712100837.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/acp-23-9549-2023
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1680-7316
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1680-7324
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-03279
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:001167516500001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-03279
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Ern, Manfred
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129117
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a The quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and global-scale tropical waves in Aeolus wind observations, radiosonde data, and reanalyses
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2023
|b EGU
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1704979878_5290
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) of the stratospheric tropical winds influences the global circulation over a wide range of latitudes and altitudes. Although it has strong effects on surface weather and climate, climate models have great difficulties in simulating a realistic QBO, especially in the lower stratosphere. Therefore, global wind observations in the tropical upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS) are of particular interest for investigating the QBO and the tropical waves that contribute significantly to its driving. In our work, we focus on the years 2018–2022 and investigate the QBO and different tropical wave modes in the UTLS region using global wind observations made by the Aeolus satellite instrument and three meteorological reanalyses: the fifth generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis (ERA-5), the Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55) of the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), and the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). Further, we compare these data with observations of selected radiosonde stations. By comparison with Aeolus observations, we find that, on zonal average, the QBO in the lower stratosphere is well represented in all three reanalyses, with ERA-5 performing best. Averaged over the years 2018–2022, agreement between Aeolus and the reanalyses is better than 1 to 2 m s−1, with somewhat larger differences during some periods. Differently from zonal averages, radiosonde stations provide only local observations and are therefore biased by global-scale tropical waves, which limits their use as a QBO standard. While reanalyses perform well on zonal average, there can be considerable local biases between reanalyses and radiosondes. We also find that, in the tropical UTLS, zonal wind variances of stationary waves and the most prominent global-scale traveling equatorial wave modes, such as Kelvin waves, Rossby-gravity waves, and equatorial Rossby waves, are in good agreement between Aeolus and all three reanalyses (in most cases better than 20 % of the peak values in the UTLS). On zonal average, this supports the use of reanalyses as a reference for comparison with free-running climate models, while locally, certain biases exist, particularly in the QBO wind shear zones and around the 2019–2020 QBO disruption.
536 _ _ |a 2112 - Climate Feedbacks (POF4-211)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112
|c POF4-211
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 2A3 - Remote Sensing (CARF - CCA) (POF4-2A3)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2A3
|c POF4-2A3
|f POF IV
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Diallo, Mohamadou A.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169614
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Khordakova, Dina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)173706
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Krisch, Isabell
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Preusse, Peter
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129143
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Reitebuch, Oliver
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Ungermann, Jörn
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129105
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Riese, Martin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129145
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/acp-23-9549-2023
|g Vol. 23, no. 16, p. 9549 - 9583
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1
|n 16
|p 9549 - 9583
|t Atmospheric chemistry and physics
|v 23
|y 2023
|x 1680-7316
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1014378/files/Invoice_Helmholtz-PUC-2023-75.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1014378/files/acp-23-9549-2023.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1014378
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129117
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169614
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)173706
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129143
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129105
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129145
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-211
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Die Atmosphäre im globalen Wandel
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l COOPERATION ACROSS RESEARCH FIELDS (CARFs)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2A0
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2A3
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Remote Sensing (CARF - CCA)
|x 1
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 p c |a APC keys set
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
|2 APC
915 p c |a Local Funding
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
|2 APC
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
|2 APC
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
|2 APC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-03-30
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-03-30
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-03-30
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-03-30
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Open peer review
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2022
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b ATMOS CHEM PHYS : 2022
|d 2023-08-23
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
|k IEK-7
|l Stratosphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21