001014932 001__ 1014932
001014932 005__ 20230914204806.0
001014932 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2023-03487
001014932 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-03487
001014932 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)177822$$aPaas Oliveros, Lya Katarina$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
001014932 1112_ $$aOrganization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM)$$cMontreal$$d2023-07-22 - 2023-07-26$$wCanada
001014932 245__ $$aPredicting dual-task performance from individualized functional and structural netwo
001014932 260__ $$c2023
001014932 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
001014932 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
001014932 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
001014932 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aCONFERENCE_POSTER
001014932 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Conference Poster
001014932 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)24$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aPoster$$bposter$$mposter$$s1694670563_15132$$xAfter Call
001014932 500__ $$aAcknowledgments: This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, LA 3071/3-1, SFB 1451), the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457), the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain, and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement No. 945539 (HBP SGA3), and a German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Scholarship.
001014932 520__ $$aIntroductionDual-tasking, the ability to perform two tasks simultaneously or in close succession, has been associated with increased fronto-parietal activity [1,2]. Furthermore, functional and structural connectivity (FC and SC) display unique features shown to be relevant to cognition and performance; however, prediction studies show overall low accuracies [3]. Accounting for inter-individual variability in macroscopic brain organization may be informative for elucidating such brain-behavior associations at the individual level [4,5]. Here, we aimed to predict dual-task performance from FC and SC in individualized task-specific and whole-brain (WB) networks.MethodsWe obtained 92 individualized discrete and homologous functional regions (Fig. 1A) from 71 healthy adults (33 females; 41 young and 30 older) by implementing an iterative cortical parcellation approach based on functional surface-level connectivity patterns [4,5] in combined resting-state and task-based fMRI data. For each participant, Pearson correlations were computed between the individualized parcels' time series to derive FC estimates. The individualized parcels were projected onto processed diffusion-weighted images and normalized between-parcel streamline counts were calculated to derive individualized SC estimates. Besides deriving WB networks, connectomes were additionally obtained from task-related parcels. These were defined through a group-level general linear model of brain activity elicited in a dual-task paradigm with spatially incongruent manual responses to auditory stimuli [6,7]. The incongruent dual-task condition recruited a large fronto-parietal network [2], which overlapped with 25 out of 92 functional regions (Fig. 1B). For comparison, we also computed FC and SC between non-individualized parcels for both WB and task-specific networks. To predict subject-level reaction time in dual-tasking with incongruent responses (615.21 ± 118.38 ms), we implemented CPM, PLS, KRR and RFR as incorporated in JuLearn [8] with a 5-times, 5-fold cross-validation (CV) approach based on eight separate feature spaces (i.e., FC vs. SC × task-specific vs. WB networks × indiv. vs. non-indiv. networks). Prediction performance was evaluated by the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), averaged across all models for all folds and repetitions of the CV test set.ResultsThe best prediction of dual-task performance was achieved by the individualized task-specific and WB structural networks (MAPE = 15.13 ± 2.32 %, and MAPE = 15.34 ± 2.27%, respectively), as well as the individualized WB functional network (MAPE = 15.45 ± 3.18 %). This was followed by the non-individualized WB functional network (MAPE = 15.73 ± 3.15 %). Predictability was lowest for the individualized task-specific functional network (MAPE = 16.73 ± 3.00).ConclusionsWhile most brain-behavior prediction studies use group-level brain atlases, our findings indicate a slight improvement in prediction accuracy when accounting for inter-individual variability in the brain's functional organization, despite the overall low predictability and small differences between feature spaces. Our results for predicting dual-task performance align with an improvement in predicting fluid intelligence from individualized functional networks [4]. Counter to expectation, WB functional networks outperformed the dual-task-specific ones, which could be related to the relevance of global brain organizational properties in brain-behavior associations [9,10], whose individual nuances are better captured by the WB functional connectome. Finally, we suggest a replication study with a larger sample and the better predictability from SC (vs. FC) calls for further research integrating multi-modal brain features to explore their unique and combined contribution to cognition [3].
001014932 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$a5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001014932 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)178611$$aJung, Kyesam$$b1$$ufzj
001014932 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHu, Dan$$b2
001014932 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131699$$aMüller, Veronika$$b3$$ufzj
001014932 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)173770$$aHeckner, Marisa$$b4$$ufzj
001014932 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161305$$aPläschke, Rachel$$b5
001014932 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aEickhoff, Simon$$b6$$ufzj
001014932 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLiu, Hesheng$$b7
001014932 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$aLangner, Robert$$b8$$ufzj
001014932 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1014932/files/Paas_Poster_OHBM2023-1.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001014932 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1014932$$popenaire$$popen_access$$pVDB$$pdriver
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)177822$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)177822$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b0
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)178611$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131699$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131699$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b3
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)173770$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)173770$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b4
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)161305$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b5
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131678$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b6
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b8$$kFZJ
001014932 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b8
001014932 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001014932 9141_ $$y2023
001014932 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001014932 920__ $$lyes
001014932 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
001014932 980__ $$aposter
001014932 980__ $$aVDB
001014932 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001014932 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
001014932 9801_ $$aFullTexts