Gast ::
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Predicting dual-task performance from individualized functional and structural netwo > print |
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Predicting dual-task performance from individualized functional and structural netwo > print |
| 001 | 1014932 | ||
| 005 | 20230914204806.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-03487 |2 datacite_doi |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2023-03487 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Paas Oliveros, Lya Katarina |0 P:(DE-Juel1)177822 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |u fzj |
| 111 | 2 | _ | |a Organization for Human Brain Mapping (OHBM) |c Montreal |d 2023-07-22 - 2023-07-26 |w Canada |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Predicting dual-task performance from individualized functional and structural netwo |
| 260 | _ | _ | |c 2023 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Conference Paper |0 33 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a INPROCEEDINGS |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a conferenceObject |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a CONFERENCE_POSTER |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Conference Poster |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Poster |b poster |m poster |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)24 |s 1694670563_15132 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |x After Call |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a Acknowledgments: This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, LA 3071/3-1, SFB 1451), the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457), the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain, and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program under Grant Agreement No. 945539 (HBP SGA3), and a German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) Scholarship. |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a IntroductionDual-tasking, the ability to perform two tasks simultaneously or in close succession, has been associated with increased fronto-parietal activity [1,2]. Furthermore, functional and structural connectivity (FC and SC) display unique features shown to be relevant to cognition and performance; however, prediction studies show overall low accuracies [3]. Accounting for inter-individual variability in macroscopic brain organization may be informative for elucidating such brain-behavior associations at the individual level [4,5]. Here, we aimed to predict dual-task performance from FC and SC in individualized task-specific and whole-brain (WB) networks.MethodsWe obtained 92 individualized discrete and homologous functional regions (Fig. 1A) from 71 healthy adults (33 females; 41 young and 30 older) by implementing an iterative cortical parcellation approach based on functional surface-level connectivity patterns [4,5] in combined resting-state and task-based fMRI data. For each participant, Pearson correlations were computed between the individualized parcels' time series to derive FC estimates. The individualized parcels were projected onto processed diffusion-weighted images and normalized between-parcel streamline counts were calculated to derive individualized SC estimates. Besides deriving WB networks, connectomes were additionally obtained from task-related parcels. These were defined through a group-level general linear model of brain activity elicited in a dual-task paradigm with spatially incongruent manual responses to auditory stimuli [6,7]. The incongruent dual-task condition recruited a large fronto-parietal network [2], which overlapped with 25 out of 92 functional regions (Fig. 1B). For comparison, we also computed FC and SC between non-individualized parcels for both WB and task-specific networks. To predict subject-level reaction time in dual-tasking with incongruent responses (615.21 ± 118.38 ms), we implemented CPM, PLS, KRR and RFR as incorporated in JuLearn [8] with a 5-times, 5-fold cross-validation (CV) approach based on eight separate feature spaces (i.e., FC vs. SC × task-specific vs. WB networks × indiv. vs. non-indiv. networks). Prediction performance was evaluated by the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), averaged across all models for all folds and repetitions of the CV test set.ResultsThe best prediction of dual-task performance was achieved by the individualized task-specific and WB structural networks (MAPE = 15.13 ± 2.32 %, and MAPE = 15.34 ± 2.27%, respectively), as well as the individualized WB functional network (MAPE = 15.45 ± 3.18 %). This was followed by the non-individualized WB functional network (MAPE = 15.73 ± 3.15 %). Predictability was lowest for the individualized task-specific functional network (MAPE = 16.73 ± 3.00).ConclusionsWhile most brain-behavior prediction studies use group-level brain atlases, our findings indicate a slight improvement in prediction accuracy when accounting for inter-individual variability in the brain's functional organization, despite the overall low predictability and small differences between feature spaces. Our results for predicting dual-task performance align with an improvement in predicting fluid intelligence from individualized functional networks [4]. Counter to expectation, WB functional networks outperformed the dual-task-specific ones, which could be related to the relevance of global brain organizational properties in brain-behavior associations [9,10], whose individual nuances are better captured by the WB functional connectome. Finally, we suggest a replication study with a larger sample and the better predictability from SC (vs. FC) calls for further research integrating multi-modal brain features to explore their unique and combined contribution to cognition [3]. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252 |c POF4-525 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Jung, Kyesam |0 P:(DE-Juel1)178611 |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Hu, Dan |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Müller, Veronika |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131699 |b 3 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Heckner, Marisa |0 P:(DE-Juel1)173770 |b 4 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Pläschke, Rachel |0 P:(DE-Juel1)161305 |b 5 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Eickhoff, Simon |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678 |b 6 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Liu, Hesheng |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Langner, Robert |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131693 |b 8 |u fzj |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1014932/files/Paas_Poster_OHBM2023-1.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1014932 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)177822 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a HHU Düsseldorf |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)177822 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)178611 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131699 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a HHU Düsseldorf |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131699 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)173770 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a HHU Düsseldorf |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)173770 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a HHU Düsseldorf |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)161305 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 6 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a HHU Düsseldorf |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 6 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131678 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 8 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131693 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a HHU Düsseldorf |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 8 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131693 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2023 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |k INM-7 |l Gehirn & Verhalten |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a poster |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|