% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Frahm:1015277,
author = {Frahm, Lennart and Satterthwaite, Theodore D. and Fox,
Peter T. and Langner, Robert and Eickhoff, Simon B.},
title = {{ALE} meta-analyses of voxel-based morphometry studies:
{P}arameter validation via large-scale simulations},
journal = {NeuroImage},
volume = {281},
issn = {1053-8119},
address = {Orlando, Fla.},
publisher = {Academic Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-03632},
pages = {120383 -},
year = {2023},
note = {This study was supported by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, EI 816/11-1 and International
Research Training Group 2150, 269953372/GRK2150), the
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH074457), the
National Institute of Aging (P30-AG066546), and the
Jülich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA) granting computation
time on the supercomputer JURECA (Jülich Supercomputing
Centre, 2018) at Forschungszentrum Jülich. Open access
funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.},
abstract = {Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis has
been applied to structural neuroimaging data since long, but
up to now, any systematic assessment of the algorithm's
behavior, power and sensitivity has been based on
simulations using functional neuroimaging databases as their
foundation. Here, we aimed to determine whether the
guidelines offered by previous evaluations can be
generalized to ALE meta-analyses of voxel-based morphometry
(VBM) studies. We ran 365000 distinct ALE analyses filled
with simulated experiments, randomly sampling parameters
from BrainMap's VBM experiment database. We then examined
the algorithm's sensitivity, its susceptibility to spurious
convergence, and its susceptibility to excessive
contributions by individual experiments. In general, the
performance of the ALE algorithm was highly comparable
between imaging modalities, with the algorithm's sensitivity
and specificity reaching similar levels with structural data
as previously observed with functional data. Because of the
lower number of foci reported and the higher number of
participants usually included in structural experiments,
individual studies had, on average, a higher impact towards
significant clusters. To prevent significant clusters from
being driven by single experiments, we recommend that
researchers include at least 23 experiments in a VBM ALE
dataset, instead of the previously recommended minimum of n
= 17. While these recommendations do not constitute hard
borders, running ALE analyses on smaller datasets would
require special diligence in assessing and reporting the
contributions of experiments to individual clusters.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {37734477},
UT = {WOS:001083784800001},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120383},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1015277},
}