001     1016860
005     20241120212348.0
024 7 _ |a 10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-03844
|2 datacite_doi
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-03844
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Tennant, Jonathan P.
|0 0000-0001-7794-0218
|b 0
245 _ _ |a A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review
260 _ _ |a London
|c 2017
|b F1000 Research Ltd
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1732084895_15938
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Peer review of research articles is a core part of our scholarly communication system. In spite of its importance, the status and purpose of peer review is often contested. What is its role in our modern digital research and communications infrastructure? Does it perform to the high standards with which it is generally regarded? Studies of peer review have shown that it is prone to bias and abuse in numerous dimensions, frequently unreliable, and can fail to detect even fraudulent research. With the advent of web technologies, we are now witnessing a phase of innovation and experimentation in our approaches to peer review. These developments prompted us to examine emerging models of peer review from a range of disciplines and venues, and to ask how they might address some of the issues with our current systems of peer review. We examine the functionality of a range of social Web platforms, and compare these with the traits underlying a viable peer review system: quality control, quantified performance metrics as engagement incentives, and certification and reputation. Ideally, any new systems will demonstrate that they out-perform and reduce the biases of existing models as much as possible. We conclude that there is considerable scope for new peer review initiatives to be developed, each with their own potential issues and advantages. We also propose a novel hybrid platform model that could, at least partially, resolve many of the socio-technical issues associated with peer review, and potentially disrupt the entire scholarly communication system. Success for any such development relies on reaching a critical threshold of research community engagement with both the process and the platform, and therefore cannot be achieved without a significant change of incentives in research environments.
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Dugan, Jonathan M.
|0 0000-0001-8525-6221
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Graziotin, Daniel
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Jacques, Damien C.
|0 0000-0002-9069-4143
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Waldner, François
|0 0000-0002-5599-7456
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Mietchen, Daniel
|0 0000-0001-9488-1870
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Elkhatib, Yehia
|0 0000-0003-4639-436X
|b 6
700 1 _ |a B. Collister, Lauren
|0 0000-0001-5767-8486
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Pikas, Christina K.
|0 0000-0002-4455-8036
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Crick, Tom
|0 0000-0001-5196-9389
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Masuzzo, Paola
|0 0000-0003-3699-1195
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Caravaggi, Anthony
|0 0000-0002-1763-8970
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Berg, Devin R.
|0 0000-0002-1193-3848
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Niemeyer, Kyle E.
|0 0000-0003-4425-7097
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Ross-Hellauer, Tony
|0 0000-0003-4470-7027
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Mannheimer, Sara
|0 0000-0002-1433-6782
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Rigling, Lillian
|0 0000-0002-9178-0422
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Katz, Daniel S.
|0 0000-0001-5934-7525
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Greshake Tzovaras, Bastian
|0 0000-0002-9925-9623
|b 18
700 1 _ |a Pacheco-Mendoza, Josmel
|0 0000-0002-2251-8092
|b 19
700 1 _ |a Fatima, Nazeefa
|0 0000-0001-7791-4984
|b 20
700 1 _ |a Poblet, Marta
|0 0000-0002-0026-989X
|b 21
700 1 _ |a Isaakidis, Marios
|0 0000-0001-8498-1309
|b 22
700 1 _ |a Irawan, Dasapta Erwin
|0 0000-0002-1526-0863
|b 23
700 1 _ |a Renaut, Sébastien
|0 0000-0002-8111-5082
|b 24
700 1 _ |a Madan, Christopher R.
|0 0000-0003-3228-6501
|b 25
700 1 _ |a Matthias, Lisa
|0 0000-0002-2612-2132
|b 26
700 1 _ |a Nørgaard Kjær, Jesper
|0 0000-0001-9183-9861
|b 27
700 1 _ |a O'Donnell, Daniel Paul
|0 0000-0002-0127-4893
|b 28
700 1 _ |a Neylon, Cameron
|0 0000-0002-0068-716X
|b 29
700 1 _ |a Kearns, Sarah
|0 0000-0001-5640-909X
|b 30
700 1 _ |a Selvaraju, Manojkumar
|0 0000-0001-6439-5652
|b 31
700 1 _ |a Colomb, Julien
|0 0000-0002-3127-5520
|b 32
773 _ _ |a 10.12688/f1000research.12037.3
|g Vol. 6, p. 1151 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2699932-8
|p 1151 -
|t F1000Research
|v 6
|y 2017
|x 2046-1402
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1016860/files/fa6fe4bc-6874-4566-9e9a-2ca3aa0c6c21_12037_-_jon_tennant_v3.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1016860
|q dnbdelivery
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-10-14T09:38:47Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-10-14T09:38:47Z
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Open peer review
|d 2020-10-14T09:38:47Z
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a Hosted Content
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)10000
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-08-22
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-22
920 _ _ |l no
980 1 _ |a OPENSCIENCE
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21