TY  - JOUR
AU  - Vögele, Stefan
AU  - Teja Josyabhatla, Vishnu
AU  - Ball, Christopher
AU  - Rhoden, Imke
AU  - Grajewski, Matthias
AU  - Rübbelke, Dirk
AU  - Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
TI  - Robust assessment of energy scenarios from stakeholders' perspectives
JO  - Energy
VL  - 282
SN  - 0360-5442
CY  - Amsterdam [u.a.]
PB  - Elsevier Science
M1  - FZJ-2023-03916
SP  - 128326 -
PY  - 2023
AB  - sing scenarios is vital in identifying and specifying measures for successfully transforming the energy system. Such transformations can be particularly challenging and require the support of a broader set of stakeholders. Otherwise, there will be opposition in the form of reluctance to adopt the necessary technologies. Usually, processes for considering stakeholders' perspectives are very time-consuming and costly. In particular, there are uncertainties about how to deal with modifications in the scenarios. In principle, new consulting processes will be required. In our study, we show how multi-criteria decision analysis can be used to analyze stakeholders' attitudes toward transition paths. Since stakeholders differ regarding their preferences and time horizons, we employ a multi-criteria decision analysis approach to identify which stakeholders will support or oppose a transition path. We provide a flexible template for analyzing stakeholder preferences toward transition paths. This flexibility comes from the fact that our multi-criteria decision analysis-based approach does not involve intensive empirical work with stakeholders. Instead, it involves subjecting assumptions to robustness analysis, which can help identify options to influence stakeholders' attitudes toward transitions.
LB  - PUB:(DE-HGF)16
UR  - <Go to ISI:>//WOS:001046433600001
DO  - DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2023.128326
UR  - https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1017074
ER  -