% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Vgele:1017074,
      author       = {Vögele, Stefan and Teja Josyabhatla, Vishnu and Ball,
                      Christopher and Rhoden, Imke and Grajewski, Matthias and
                      Rübbelke, Dirk and Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm},
      title        = {{R}obust assessment of energy scenarios from stakeholders'
                      perspectives},
      journal      = {Energy},
      volume       = {282},
      issn         = {0360-5442},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2023-03916},
      pages        = {128326 -},
      year         = {2023},
      abstract     = {sing scenarios is vital in identifying and specifying
                      measures for successfully transforming the energy system.
                      Such transformations can be particularly challenging and
                      require the support of a broader set of stakeholders.
                      Otherwise, there will be opposition in the form of
                      reluctance to adopt the necessary technologies. Usually,
                      processes for considering stakeholders' perspectives are
                      very time-consuming and costly. In particular, there are
                      uncertainties about how to deal with modifications in the
                      scenarios. In principle, new consulting processes will be
                      required. In our study, we show how multi-criteria decision
                      analysis can be used to analyze stakeholders' attitudes
                      toward transition paths. Since stakeholders differ regarding
                      their preferences and time horizons, we employ a
                      multi-criteria decision analysis approach to identify which
                      stakeholders will support or oppose a transition path. We
                      provide a flexible template for analyzing stakeholder
                      preferences toward transition paths. This flexibility comes
                      from the fact that our multi-criteria decision
                      analysis-based approach does not involve intensive empirical
                      work with stakeholders. Instead, it involves subjecting
                      assumptions to robustness analysis, which can help identify
                      options to influence stakeholders' attitudes toward
                      transitions.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {600},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001046433600001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.energy.2023.128326},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1017074},
}