001     1017074
005     20240116084320.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128326
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0360-5442
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-6785
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-03916
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:001046433600001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-03916
082 _ _ |a 600
100 1 _ |a Vögele, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130491
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Robust assessment of energy scenarios from stakeholders' perspectives
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2023
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1700810599_5330
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a sing scenarios is vital in identifying and specifying measures for successfully transforming the energy system. Such transformations can be particularly challenging and require the support of a broader set of stakeholders. Otherwise, there will be opposition in the form of reluctance to adopt the necessary technologies. Usually, processes for considering stakeholders' perspectives are very time-consuming and costly. In particular, there are uncertainties about how to deal with modifications in the scenarios. In principle, new consulting processes will be required. In our study, we show how multi-criteria decision analysis can be used to analyze stakeholders' attitudes toward transition paths. Since stakeholders differ regarding their preferences and time horizons, we employ a multi-criteria decision analysis approach to identify which stakeholders will support or oppose a transition path. We provide a flexible template for analyzing stakeholder preferences toward transition paths. This flexibility comes from the fact that our multi-criteria decision analysis-based approach does not involve intensive empirical work with stakeholders. Instead, it involves subjecting assumptions to robustness analysis, which can help identify options to influence stakeholders' attitudes toward transitions.
536 _ _ |a 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Teja Josyabhatla, Vishnu
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Ball, Christopher
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169362
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Rhoden, Imke
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)186003
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Grajewski, Matthias
|0 0000-0001-8115-7074
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Rübbelke, Dirk
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130467
|b 6
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128326
|g Vol. 282, p. 128326 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2019804-8
|p 128326 -
|t Energy
|v 282
|y 2023
|x 0360-5442
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1017074/files/Manuscript.docx
|y Published on 2023-07-04. Available in OpenAccess from 2025-07-04.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1017074
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130491
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)169362
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)186003
910 1 _ |a External Institute
|0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|k Extern
|b 4
|6 0000-0001-8115-7074
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130467
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-08-30
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-08-30
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2023-10-22
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-10-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-10-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-10-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2023-10-22
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ENERGY : 2022
|d 2023-10-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-10-22
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2023-10-22
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2023-10-22
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b ENERGY : 2022
|d 2023-10-22
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21