% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Khler:1017079,
author = {Köhler, Cristiano and Grün, Sonja and Denker, Michael},
title = {{G}aining insight into the analysis of electrophysiology
data: the {N}euroelectrophysiology {A}nalysis {O}ntology},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-03921},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Electrophysiology is frequently used to investigate brain
function. The analysis of electrophysiology data requires
specific transformations and methods of varying complexity,
which makes the description of the processes involved and
their results challenging. First, there are several
variations of methods that can be applied to the data with
similar purposes (e.g., different algorithms to compute the
power spectral density from local field potentials), leading
to multiple levels of granularity in the description.
Second, a particular method can be implemented by different
software codes (e.g., toolboxes such as Elephant [1] or MNE
[2]; see also [3]) that adopt different names for the
functions and the parameters used. In the end, this two-fold
ambiguity leads to a situation where the outcome of an
analysis is difficult to describe, and finding and comparing
results based on such descriptions require expert knowledge
and is hardly machine-actionable.An ontology defines the
concepts within a domain without ambiguity (e.g., the exact
method to compute a power spectral density) while providing
relationships with semantic information (e.g., a grouping of
spectral estimators). Therefore, the description of the
processes used for the analysis of electrophysiology data
with an ontology will allow their understanding and
identification despite the method or implementation used.
There are several ontologies in the biomedical sciences
including a few for neuroscience and electrophysiology [4].
However, their level of description is limited to the data,
metadata or general parts of the analysis workflow (e.g.,
experiments, subjects, equipment, and basic data
input/output).We implemented the Neuroelectrophysiology
Analysis Ontology (NEAO) to define a unified vocabulary and
standardize the descriptions of the methods involved in the
analysis of electrophysiology data. We show real-world
examples where the NEAO was used to annotate the provenance
information from different analyses of an electrophysiology
dataset and highlight how it is possible to query
information, facilitating finding and obtaining insights on
the results (e.g., using knowledge graphs). In this way,
NEAO identifies groups of similar methods while pointing to
literature that informs of their differences. We demonstrate
how NEAO can seamlessly integrate with Alpaca [5] to capture
provenance information. This will help to represent the
analysis results according to the FAIR principles
[6].References:[1] Elephant $(RRID:SCR_003833);$ Denker, M.,
Yegenoglu, A., Grün, S. (2018) Collaborative HPC-enabled
workflows on the HBP Collaboratory using the Elephant
framework. Neuroinformatics 2018, P19.
https://python-elephant.org
[doi:10.12751/incf.ni2018.0019][2] MNE $(RRID:SCR_005972);$
Gramfort, A. et al. (2013) MEG and EEG data analysis with
MNE-Python. Frontiers in Neuroscience 7, 267.
https://mne.tools [doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00267][3]
Unakafova, V.A., Gail, A. (2019) Comparing Open-Source
Toolboxes for Processing and Analysis of Spike and Local
Field Potentials Data. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 13, 57.
[doi:10.3389/fninf.2019.00057][4] NCBO BioPortal,
https://bioportal.bioontology.org[5] Alpaca
$(RRID:SCR_023739),$ https://alpaca-prov.readthedocs.io [6]
Wilkinson, M.D. et al. (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles
for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific
Data 3, 160018. [doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18]},
month = {Sep},
date = {2023-09-26},
organization = {Bernstein Conference 2023, Berlin
(Germany), 26 Sep 2023 - 29 Sep 2023},
subtyp = {Other},
keywords = {Computational Neuroscience (Other) / Data analysis, machine
learning and neuroinformatics (Other)},
cin = {INM-6 / IAS-6 / INM-10},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828 /
I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113},
pnm = {5235 - Digitization of Neuroscience and User-Community
Building (POF4-523) / 5231 - Neuroscientific Foundations
(POF4-523) / HDS LEE - Helmholtz School for Data Science in
Life, Earth and Energy (HDS LEE) (HDS-LEE-20190612) / HBP
SGA2 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2
(785907) / HBP SGA3 - Human Brain Project Specific Grant
Agreement 3 (945539)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5235 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5231 /
G:(DE-Juel1)HDS-LEE-20190612 / G:(EU-Grant)785907 /
G:(EU-Grant)945539},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)24},
doi = {10.12751/NNCN.BC2023.197},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1017079},
}