% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Zier:1017191,
      author       = {Zier, Michael and Pflugradt, Noah and Stenzel, Peter and
                      Kotzur, Leander and Stolten, Detlef},
      title        = {{I}ndustrial decarbonization pathways: {T}he example of the
                      {G}erman glass industry},
      journal      = {Energy conversion and management: X},
      volume       = {17},
      issn         = {2590-1745},
      address      = {Amsterdam},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2023-04004},
      pages        = {100336 -},
      year         = {2023},
      abstract     = {Mitigating anthropogenic climate change and achieving the
                      Paris climate goals is one of the greatest challenges of the
                      twenty-first century. To meet the Paris climate goals,
                      sector-specific transformation pathways need to be defined.
                      The different transformation pathways are used to
                      hypothetically quantify whether a defined climate target is
                      achievable or not. For this reason, a bottom-up model was
                      developed to assess the extent of selected industrial
                      decarbonization options compared to conventionally used
                      technologies from an emissions perspective. Thereby, the
                      bottom-up model is used to analyze the German container and
                      flat glass industries as an example. The results show that
                      no transformation pathway can be compatible with the 1.5 °C
                      based strict carbon dioxide budget target. Even the best
                      case scenario exceeds the 1.5 °C based target by
                      approximately + 200 $\%.$ The 2 °C based loose carbon
                      dioxide budget target is only achievable via fuel switching,
                      the complete phase-out from natural gas to renewable energy
                      carriers. Furthermore, the results of hydrogen for flat
                      glass production demonstrate that missing investments in
                      renewable energy carriers may lead to the non-compliance
                      with actually achievable 2 °C based carbon dioxide budget
                      targets. In conclusion, the phase-out from natural gas to
                      renewable energies should be executed at the end of the life
                      of any existing furnace, and process emissions should be
                      avoided in the long term to contribute to 1.5 °C based
                      strict carbon dioxide budget target.},
      cin          = {IEK-3},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
                      / 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000898810900007},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100336},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1017191},
}