% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Sun:1018027,
author = {Sun, Ying and Wen, Jiaming and Gu, Lianhong and Joiner,
Joanna and Chang, Christine Y. and van der Tol, Christiaan
and Porcar-Castell, Albert and Magney, Troy and Wang, Lixin
and Hu, Leiqiu and Rascher, Uwe and Zarco-Tejada, Pablo and
Barrett, Christopher B. and Lai, Jiameng and Han, Jimei and
Luo, Zhenqi},
title = {{F}rom remotely‐sensed solar‐induced chlorophyll
fluorescence to ecosystem structure, function, and service:
{P}art {II}—{H}arnessing data},
journal = {Global change biology},
volume = {29},
number = {11},
issn = {1354-1013},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-04490},
pages = {2893 - 2925},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Although our observing capabilities of solar-induced
chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) have been growing rapidly,
the quality and consistency of SIF datasets are still in an
active stage of research and development. As a result, there
are considerable inconsistencies among diverse SIF datasets
at all scales and the widespread applications of them have
led to contradictory findings. The present review is the
second of the two companion reviews, and data oriented. It
aims to (1) synthesize the variety, scale, and uncertainty
of existing SIF datasets, (2) synthesize the diverse
applications in the sector of ecology, agriculture,
hydrology, climate, and socioeconomics, and (3) clarify how
such data inconsistency superimposed with the theoretical
complexities laid out in (Sun et al., 2023) may impact
process interpretation of various applications and
contribute to inconsistent findings. We emphasize that
accurate interpretation of the functional relationships
between SIF and other ecological indicators is contingent
upon complete understanding of SIF data quality and
uncertainty. Biases and uncertainties in SIF observations
can significantly confound interpretation of their
relationships and how such relationships respond to
environmental variations. Built upon our syntheses, we
summarize existing gaps and uncertainties in current SIF
observations. Further, we offer our perspectives on
innovations needed to help improve informing ecosystem
structure, function, and service under climate change,
including enhancing in-situ SIF observing capability
especially in "data desert" regions, improving
cross-instrument data standardization and network
coordination, and advancing applications by fully harnessing
theory and data.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {36802124},
UT = {WOS:000950362600001},
doi = {10.1111/gcb.16646},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1018027},
}