% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pauw:1018093,
author = {Pauw, Brian R. and Smales, Glen J. and Anker, Andy S. and
Annadurai, Venkatasamy and Balazs, Daniel M. and Bienert,
Ralf and Bouwman, Wim G. and Breßler, Ingo and Breternitz,
Joachim and Brok, Erik S. and Bryant, Gary and Clulow,
Andrew J. and Crater, Erin R. and De Geuser, Frédéric and
Del Giudice, Alessandra and Deumer, Jérôme and Disch,
Sabrina and Dutt, Shankar and Frank, Kilian and Fratini,
Emiliano and Garcia, Paulo R. A. F. and Gilbert, Elliot P.
and Hahn, Marc B. and Hallett, James and Hohenschutz, Max
and Hollamby, Martin and Huband, Steven and Ilavsky, Jan and
Jochum, Johanna K. and Juelsholt, Mikkel and Mansel, Bradley
W. and Penttilä, Paavo and Pittkowski, Rebecca K. and
Portale, Giuseppe and Pozzo, Lilo D. and Rochels, Leonhard
and Rosalie, Julian M. and Saloga, Patrick E. J. and Seibt,
Susanne and Smith, Andrew J. and Smith, Gregory N. and
Spiering, Glenn A. and Stawski, Tomasz M. and Taché,
Olivier and Thünemann, Andreas F. and Toth, Kristof and
Whitten, Andrew E. and Wuttke, Joachim},
title = {{T}he human factor: results of a small-angle scattering
data analysis round robin},
journal = {Journal of applied crystallography},
volume = {56},
number = {6},
issn = {0021-8898},
address = {[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-04543},
pages = {1618-1629},
year = {2023},
note = {open access},
abstract = {A round-robin study has been carried out to estimate the
impact of the humanelement in small-angle scattering data
analysis. Four corrected datasets wereprovided to
participants ready for analysis. All datasets were measured
onsamples containing spherical scatterers, with two datasets
in dilute dispersionsand two from powders. Most of the 46
participants correctly identified thenumber of populations
in the dilute dispersions, with half of the populationmean
entries within $1.5\%$ and half of the population width
entries within $40\%.Due$ to the added complexity of the
structure factor, far fewer people submittedanswers on the
powder datasets. For those that did, half of the entries for
themeans and widths were within 44 and $86\%,$ respectively.
This round-robinexperiment highlights several causes for the
discrepancies, for which solutionsare proposed.},
cin = {JCNS-FRM-II / JCNS-4 / MLZ},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-FRM-II-20110218 /
I:(DE-Juel1)JCNS-4-20201012 / I:(DE-588b)4597118-3},
pnm = {6G4 - Jülich Centre for Neutron Research (JCNS) (FZJ)
(POF4-6G4) / 632 - Materials – Quantum, Complex and
Functional Materials (POF4-632)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-6G4 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-632},
experiment = {EXP:(DE-MLZ)NOSPEC-20140101},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:001120776200002},
doi = {10.1107/S1600576723008324},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1018093},
}