001018170 001__ 1018170
001018170 005__ 20231120201910.0
001018170 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2023-04610
001018170 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-04610
001018170 041__ $$aEnglish
001018170 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBrembs, Björn$$b0$$eCorresponding author
001018170 1112_ $$aJülich Open Science Speaker Series$$cJülich$$gJOSSS$$wGermany
001018170 245__ $$aPrestigious journals struggle to reach even average reliability
001018170 260__ $$c2023
001018170 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$alecture
001018170 3367_ $$031$$2EndNote$$aGeneric
001018170 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aMISC
001018170 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)17$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aLecture$$blecture$$mlecture$$s1700463778_6947$$xInvited
001018170 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aLECTURE_SPEECH
001018170 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aText
001018170 520__ $$aThe journal in which a scientist publishes is considered one of the most crucial factors determining their career. The underlying common assumption is that only the best scientists manage to publish in a highly selective tier of the most prestigious journals. However, data from several lines of evidence suggest that the methodological quality of scientific experiments does not increase with increasing rank of the journal. On the contrary, an accumulating body of evidence suggests the inverse: methodological quality and, consequently, reliability of published research works in several fields may be decreasing with increasing journal rank.The data supporting these conclusions circumvent confounding factors such as increased readership and scrutiny for these journals, focusing instead on quantifiable indicators of methodological soundness in the published literature, relying on, in part, semi-automated data extraction from often thousands of publications at a time. With the accumulating evidence over the last decade grew the realization that the very existence of scholarly journals, due to their inherent hierarchy, constitutes one of the major threats to publicly funded science: hiring, promoting and funding scientists who publish unreliable science eventually erodes public trust in science.
001018170 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899$$a899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)$$cPOF4-899$$fPOF IV$$x0
001018170 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)7047$$aBertuch, Oliver$$b1$$eEditor
001018170 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)195900$$aGonzalez-Marquez, Monica$$b2$$eContributor
001018170 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1018170/files/Lecture.mp4$$yOpenAccess
001018170 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1018170/files/Slides.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001018170 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1018170/files/Transcript.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001018170 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1018170$$popenaire$$popen_access$$pVDB$$pdriver
001018170 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)7047$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
001018170 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)195900$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
001018170 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vohne Topic$$x0
001018170 9141_ $$y2023
001018170 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001018170 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001018170 920__ $$lyes
001018170 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406$$kZB$$lZentralbibliothek$$x0
001018170 980__ $$alecture
001018170 980__ $$aVDB
001018170 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001018170 980__ $$aOPENSCIENCE
001018170 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ZB-20090406
001018170 9801_ $$aFullTexts