001018437 001__ 1018437
001018437 005__ 20240429104855.0
001018437 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1093/braincomms/fcad275
001018437 0247_ $$2datacite_doi$$a10.34734/FZJ-2023-04812
001018437 0247_ $$2pmid$$a37908237
001018437 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:001186789900009
001018437 037__ $$aFZJ-2023-04812
001018437 082__ $$a610
001018437 1001_ $$aKrick, Sebastian$$b0
001018437 245__ $$aNeuroanatomy of post-stroke depression: the association between symptom clusters and lesion location
001018437 260__ $$a[Großbritannien]$$bGuarantors of Brain$$c2023
001018437 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001018437 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001018437 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1700747062_4449
001018437 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001018437 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001018437 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001018437 520__ $$aPost-stroke depression affects about 30% of stroke patients and often hampers functional recovery. The diagnosis of depression encompasses heterogeneous symptoms at emotional, motivational, cognitive, behavioural or somatic levels. Evidence indicates that depression is caused by disruption of bio-aminergic fibre tracts between prefrontal and limbic or striatal brain regions comprising different functional networks. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping studies reported discrepant findings regarding the association between infarct locations and depression. Inconsistencies may be due to the usage of sum scores, thereby mixing different symptoms of depression. In this cross-sectional study, we used multivariate support vector regression for lesion-symptom mapping to identify regions significantly involved in distinct depressive symptom domains and global depression. MRI lesion data were included from 200 patients with acute first-ever ischaemic stroke (mean 0.9 ± 1.5 days of post-stroke). The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating interview assessed depression severity in five symptom domains encompassing motivational, emotional and cognitive symptoms deficits, anxiety and somatic symptoms and was examined 8.4 days of post-stroke (±4.3). We found that global depression severity, irrespective of individual symptom domains, was primarily linked to right hemispheric lesions in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior frontal gyrus. In contrast, when considering distinct symptom domains individually, the analyses yielded much more sensitive results in regions where the correlations with the global depression score yielded no effects. Accordingly, motivational deficits were associated with lesions in orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, pre- and post-central gyri and basal ganglia, including putamen and pallidum. Lesions affecting the dorsal thalamus, anterior insula and somatosensory cortex were significantly associated with emotional symptoms such as sadness. Damage to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was associated with concentration deficits, cognitive symptoms of guilt and self-reproach. Furthermore, somatic symptoms, including loss of appetite and sleep disturbances, were linked to the insula, parietal operculum and amygdala lesions. Likewise, anxiety was associated with lesions impacting the central operculum, insula and inferior frontal gyrus. Interestingly, symptoms of anxiety were exclusively left hemispheric, whereas the lesion-symptom associations of the other domains were lateralized to the right hemisphere. In conclusion, this large-scale study shows that in acute stroke patients, differential post-stroke depression symptom domains are associated with specific structural correlates. Our findings extend existing concepts on the neural underpinnings of depressive symptoms, indicating that differential lesion patterns lead to distinct depressive symptoms in the first weeks of post-stroke. These findings may facilitate the development of personalized treatments to improve post-stroke rehabilitation.Keywords: MADRS; SVR-LSM; large-scale; multivariate; neural substrates.
001018437 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$a5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
001018437 536__ $$0G:(GEPRIS)431549029$$aDFG project 431549029 - SFB 1451: Schlüsselmechanismen normaler und krankheitsbedingt gestörter motorischer Kontrolle (431549029)$$c431549029$$x1
001018437 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001018437 7001_ $$aKoob, Janusz L$$b1
001018437 7001_ $$aLatarnik, Sylvia$$b2
001018437 7001_ $$00000-0002-0161-654X$$aVolz, Lukas J$$b3
001018437 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon R$$b4$$ufzj
001018437 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161406$$aGrefkes, Christian$$b5$$eCorresponding author
001018437 7001_ $$aRehme, Anne K$$b6
001018437 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)3020013-1$$a10.1093/braincomms/fcad275$$gVol. 5, no. 5, p. fcad275$$n5$$pfcad275$$tBrain communications$$v5$$x2632-1297$$y2023
001018437 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1018437/files/PDF.pdf$$yOpenAccess
001018437 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1018437$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
001018437 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
001018437 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)161406$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
001018437 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
001018437 9141_ $$y2023
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0112$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bEmerging Sources Citation Index$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bBRAIN COMMUN : 2022$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2022-02-21T13:34:18Z
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2022-02-21T13:34:18Z
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Anonymous peer review$$d2022-02-21T13:34:18Z
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central$$d2023-08-24
001018437 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-08-24
001018437 920__ $$lyes
001018437 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
001018437 980__ $$ajournal
001018437 980__ $$aVDB
001018437 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001018437 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
001018437 9801_ $$aFullTexts