% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Nmeth:1019095,
author = {Németh, Andrea H. and Antoniades, Chrystalina A. and
Dukart, Jürgen and Minnerop, Martina and Rentz, Clara and
Schuman, Bart-Jan and van de Warrenburg, Bart and Willemse,
Ilse and Bertini, Enrico and Gupta, Anoopum S. and de Mello
Monteiro, Carlos Bandeira and Almoajil, Hajar and Quinn,
Lori and Perlman, Susan B. and Horak, Fay and Ilg, Winfried
and Traschütz, Andreas and Vogel, Adam P. and Dawes, Helen},
title = {{U}sing {S}martphone {S}ensors for {A}taxia {T}rials:
{C}onsensus {G}uidance by the {A}taxia {G}lobal {I}nitiative
{W}orking {G}roup on {D}igital-{M}otor {B}iomarkers},
journal = {The cerebellum},
volume = {23},
issn = {1473-4222},
address = {New York},
publisher = {Springer US},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-05148},
pages = {912-923},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Smartphone sensors are used increasingly in the assessment
of ataxias. To date, there is no specific consensus guidance
regarding a priority set of smartphone sensor measurements,
or standard assessment criteria that are appropriate for
clinical trials. As part of the Ataxia Global Initiative
Digital-Motor Biomarkers Working Group (AGI WG4), aimed at
evaluating key ataxia clinical domains (gait/posture, upper
limb, speech and oculomotor assessments), we provide
consensus guidance for use of internal smartphone sensors to
assess key domains. Guidance was developed by means of a
literature review and a two stage Delphi study conducted by
an Expert panel, which surveyed members of AGI WG4,
representing clinical, research, industry and patient-led
experts, and consensus meetings by the Expert panel to agree
on standard criteria and map current literature to these
criteria. Seven publications were identified that
investigated ataxias using internal smartphone sensors. The
Delphi 1 survey ascertained current practice, and systems in
use or under development. Wide variations in smartphones
sensor use for assessing ataxia were identified. The Delphi
2 survey identified seven measures that were strongly
endorsed as priorities in assessing 3/4 domains, namely
gait/posture, upper limb, and speech performance. The Expert
panel recommended 15 standard criteria to be fulfilled in
studies. Evaluation of current literature revealed that none
of the studies met all criteria, with most being early-phase
validation studies. Our guidance highlights the importance
of consensus, identifies priority measures and standard
criteria, and will encourage further research into the use
of internal smartphone sensors to measure ataxia
digital-motor biomarkers.},
cin = {INM-7 / INM-1},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
pnm = {353 - Clinical and Health Care Research (POF4-353) / 5251 -
Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-353 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {38015365},
UT = {WOS:001118809700001},
doi = {10.1007/s12311-023-01608-3},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1019095},
}