% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Alho:1019154,
author = {Alho, Jussi and Lahnakoski, Juha M. and Panula, Jonatan M.
and Rikandi, Eva and Mäntylä, Teemu and Lindgren, Maija
and Kieseppä, Tuula and Suvisaari, Jaana and Sams, Mikko
and Raij, Tuukka T.},
title = {{H}ippocampus-{C}entered {N}etwork {I}s {A}ssociated {W}ith
{P}ositive {S}ymptom {A}lleviation in {P}atients {W}ith
{F}irst-{E}pisode {P}sychosis},
journal = {Biological psychiatry / Cognitive neuroscience and
neuroimaging},
volume = {8},
number = {12},
issn = {2451-9022},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Inc.},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-05202},
pages = {1197 - 1206},
year = {2023},
abstract = {BackgroundPrevious functional magnetic resonance imaging
studies have reported widespread brain functional
connectivity alterations in patients with psychosis. These
studies have mostly used either resting-state or simple-task
paradigms, thereby compromising experimental control or
ecological validity, respectively. Additionally, in a
conventional functional magnetic resonance imaging
intrasubject functional connectivity analysis, it is
difficult to identify which connections relate to extrinsic
(stimulus-induced) and which connections relate to intrinsic
(non–stimulus-related) neural processes.MethodsTo mitigate
these limitations, we used intersubject functional
connectivity (ISFC) to analyze longitudinal functional
magnetic resonance imaging data collected while 36
individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) and 29 age-
and sex-matched population control participants watched
scenes from the fantasy movie Alice in Wonderland at
baseline and again at 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, to
allow unconfounded comparison and to overcome possible
circularity of ISFC, we introduced a novel approach wherein
ISFC in both the FEP and population control groups was
calculated with respect to an independent group of
participants (not included in the analyses).ResultsUsing
this independent-reference ISFC approach, we found an
interaction effect wherein the independent-reference ISFC in
individuals with FEP, but not in the control group
participants, was significantly stronger at baseline than at
follow-up in a network centered in the hippocampus and
involving thalamic, striatal, and cortical regions, such as
the orbitofrontal cortex. Alleviation of positive symptoms,
particularly delusions, from baseline to follow-up was
correlated with decreased network connectivity in patients
with FEP.ConclusionsThese findings link deviation of
naturalistic information processing in the
hippocampus-centered network to positive symptoms.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {37336263},
UT = {WOS:001135945600001},
doi = {10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.06.002},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1019154},
}