001     1019400
005     20240116084328.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/bioengineering10111244
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2023-05360
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a 38002368
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:001109553700001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2023-05360
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Zrenner, Rita
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Does Constitutive Expression of Defense-Related Genes and Salicylic Acid Concentrations Correlate with Field Resistance of Potato to Black Scurf Disease?
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2023
|b MDPI
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1702990693_14857
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Black scurf disease on potato caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG3 occurs worldwide and isdifficult to control. The use of potato cultivars resistant to black scurf disease could be part of anintegrated control strategy. Currently, the degree of resistance is based on symptom assessment inthe field, but molecular measures could provide a more efficient screening method. We hypothesizedthat the degree of field resistance to black scurf disease in potato cultivars is associated with defense-related gene expression levels and salicylic acid (SA) concentration. Cultivars with a moderate andsevere appearance of disease symptoms on tubers were selected and cultivated in the same field. Inaddition, experiments were conducted under controlled conditions in an axenic in vitro culture and ina sand culture to analyze the constitutive expression of defense-related genes and SA concentration.The more resistant cultivars did not show significantly higher constitutive expression levels of defense-related genes. Moreover, the level of free SA was increased in the more resistant cultivars only in theroots of the plantlets grown in the sand culture. These results indicate that neither expression levelsof defense-related genes nor the amount of SA in potato plants can be used as reliable predictors ofthe field resistance of potato genotypes to black scurf disease.
536 _ _ |a 2171 - Biological and environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to DataCite
650 2 7 |a Biology
|0 V:(DE-MLZ)SciArea-160
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Genzel, Franziska
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)174102
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Baldermann, Susanne
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Guerra, Tiziana
|0 0000-0002-0199-7354
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Grosch, Rita
|0 0000-0002-7179-5715
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/bioengineering10111244
|g Vol. 10, no. 11, p. 1244 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2746191-9
|n 11
|p 1244 -
|t Bioengineering
|v 10
|y 2023
|x 2306-5354
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1019400/files/bioengineering-10-01244-v2.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1019400/files/bioengineering-10-01244-v2.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1019400/files/bioengineering-10-01244-v2.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1019400/files/bioengineering-10-01244-v2.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1019400/files/bioengineering-10-01244-v2.jpg?subformat=icon-640
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1019400
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)174102
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2023
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BIOENGINEERING-BASEL : 2022
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2023-07-31T16:04:44Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2023-07-31T16:04:44Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2023-07-31T16:04:44Z
920 _ _ |l no
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-4-20200403
|k IBG-4
|l Bioinformatik
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-4-20200403
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21