% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bayat:1020234,
author = {Bayat, Bagher and Raj, Rahul and Graf, Alexander and
Vereecken, Harry and Montzka, Carsten},
title = {{C}omprehensive accuracy assessment of long-term
geostationary {SEVIRI}-{MSG} evapotranspiration estimates
across {E}urope},
journal = {Remote sensing of environment},
volume = {301},
issn = {0034-4257},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2023-05901},
pages = {113875 -},
year = {2024},
abstract = {This study quantifies the accuracy of evapotranspiration
(ET) estimates from the Spinning Enhanced Visible and
Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) geostationary sensor onboard the
Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) satellites, along seven key
dimensions, i.e., diurnal cycle, daily, intra-annual,
inter-annual, ecosystem, climate zone, and products
intercomparison. In situ measurements were collected at 54
eddy covariance (EC) sites to evaluate the accuracy of
SEVIRI actual ET products (diurnal and daily SEVIRI-ETa) as
well as reference ET (daily SEVIRI-ET0) covering the period
from 2004 to 2018 across Europe. SEVIRI-ETa is produced by
the Tiled ECMWF Surface Scheme of Exchange processes at the
Land surface (TESSEL) model, while SEVIRI-ET0 is estimated
by a combination of a thermodynamically-based and an
atmospheric boundary layer model. This evaluation is further
separated according to the land cover heterogeneity of the
SEVIRI pixels across all 54 EC sites, using MODIS land cover
data. The Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), along with the
Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) and their respective
decompositions, were employed to quantify the errors.For
diurnal SEVIRI-ETa estimates, we found that the KGE (RMSE
[mm hour−1]) varied between −1.6 (0.04) to 0.8 (0.14),
with a median value of 0.26 (0.07). Higher accuracy for
diurnal SEVIRI-ETa was obtained in the summer and during the
mid-day time. For daily SEVIRI-ETa, the KGE (RMSE [mm
day−1]) varied between −0.88 (0.43) to 0.93 (1.79), with
a median value of 0.6 (0.77) and for daily SEVIRI-ET0 the
KGE (RMSE [mm day−1]) varied between 0.51 (0.40) to 0.94
(1.50), with a median value of 0.77 (0.57). For daily
SEVIRI-ETa, intra-annual accuracy was low from January to
March, increased in the mid-year, and then began to decline
from November to December. Although accuracy remained
relatively stable during the middle of the year, it varied
considerably in the winter period. In the inter-annual
dimension, the mid-year positive KGE values and
distributions changed over time from 2004 to 2018. In
spatial dimensions, the highest accuracy was in peat and
grassland ecosystems, and the lowest in cropland ecosystem,
with similar patterns observed in the boreal snow fully
humid warm summer and warm temperate fully humid hot summer
climate zones. Regarding SEVIRI-ET0 results, similar to
SEVIRI-ETa, intra-annual accuracy was low in the first
quarter of the year and the last one but high in the
mid-year. In the inter-annual dimension, unlike SEVIRI-ETa,
almost an identical pattern was observed for the mid-year
positive KGE values, demonstrating only a slight change in
SEVIRI-ET0 accuracy during 2004–2018. However, the highest
accuracy was found in crop ecosystem, while the lowest was
in forest ecosystem, reflecting similar trends in the warm
temperate fully humid hot summer and warm temperate summer
dry hot summer climate zones. The observed range of median
RMSE changed between 0.4 and 1.5 mm day−1, also suggests a
reasonable accuracy for SEVIRI-ET estimates in all spatial
domains.Our results showed that the main trends in the
accuracies (median KGEs) of SEVIRI-ET (both ETa and ET0)
remained similar in separated homogeneous and heterogeneous
sites and were comparable to combined sites among the
dimensions. Through error decomposition, we discerned that
SEVIRI-ET estimates performed particularly well in
explaining inter-annual and spatial variabilities.
Furthermore, the intercomparison of ET products revealed
that SEVIRI satellite-derived ETa exhibited the strongest
correlation with in situ ET measurements across all
ecosystem types and climate zones, outperforming other
products (such as MODIS, PML, GLEAM, and BESS). The ET
estimates from other products exhibited lower standard
deviation errors and were in closer agreement with the in
situ measurements. This study provides the first
comprehensive evaluation of the accuracy of SEVIRI diurnal
and daily ET products across Europe, which may serve as a
stimulus for further optimized selection of these products
by potential users for various applications.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217) / ERA-PLANET - The European network for observing
our changing planet (689443) / Verbundvorhaben H2-Atlas:
Potentialatlas Grüner Wasserstoff in Afrika - Eine
technologische, ökologische und sozioökonomische
Machbarkeitsstudie (03EW0001A)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173 / G:(EU-Grant)689443 /
G:(BMBF)03EW0001A},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:001134603000001},
doi = {10.1016/j.rse.2023.113875},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1020234},
}