% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Waagmeester:1020648,
      author       = {Waagmeester, Andra and Willighagen, Egon L. and Su, Andrew
                      I. and Kutmon, Martina and Gayo, Jose Emilio Labra and
                      Fernández-Álvarez, Daniel and Groom, Quentin and Schaap,
                      Peter J. and Verhagen, Lisa M. and Koehorst, Jasper J.},
      title        = {{A} protocol for adding knowledge to {W}ikidata: aligning
                      resources on human coronaviruses},
      journal      = {BMC biology},
      volume       = {19},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {1741-7007},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-00331},
      pages        = {12},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {Citations are an essential aspect of research communication
                      and have become the basis of many evaluation met‑rics in
                      the academic world. Some see citation counts as a mark of
                      scientific impact or even quality, but in reality thereasons
                      for citing other work are manifold which makes the
                      interpretation more complicated than a single citationcount
                      can reflect. Two years ago, the Journal of Cheminformatics
                      proposed the CiTO Pilot for the adoption of a practiceof
                      annotating citations with their citation intentions.
                      Basically, when you cite a journal article or dataset (or
                      any othersource), you also explain why specifically you cite
                      that source. Particularly, the agreement and disagreement
                      andreuse of methods and data are of interest. This article
                      explores what happened after the launch of the pilot. We
                      sum‑marize how authors in the Journal of Cheminformatics
                      used the pilot, shows citation annotations are distributed
                      withWikidata, visualized with Scholia, discusses adoption
                      outside BMC, and finally present some thoughts on what
                      needsto happen next.},
      ddc          = {610},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1186/s12915-020-00940-y},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1020648},
}