% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Aniello:1021094,
author = {Aniello, Gianmarco and Bertsch, Valentin and Ball,
Christopher and Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm},
title = {{S}ubsidies or cost-reflective energy tariffs?
{A}lternative pathways for decarbonizing the residential
sector and implications for cost efficiency},
journal = {Applied energy},
volume = {358},
issn = {0306-2619},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-00548},
pages = {122273},
year = {2024},
abstract = {This study assesses alternative energy technologies (i.e.,
PV and battery systems, electric heat pumps, hybrid gas
heating with solar thermal energy) in terms of profitability
and CO2 emissions, for the case of two simulated typical
households living in detached houses in Germany. Under the
status-quo regulatory framework, the energy transition in
the heating sector is fostered through grants for replacing
old heating systems, whereas PV generation is fostered by
feed-in tariffs and indirect subsidies for self-consumption.
This study considers an alternative regulatory scenario with
a more market-oriented approach, finding that a CO2-oriented
reform of energy surcharges and taxes, as well as a reform
of network charges, can support a more cost-efficient energy
transition in the residential sector. The paper concludes
with a discussion of the consistency, cost efficiency and
effectiveness of past and current policies underpinning the
energy transition in the residential sector.},
cin = {IEK-STE},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
pnm = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
(POF4-111)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:001325847400001},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122273},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1021094},
}