% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Lamad:1022024,
      author       = {Lamadé, Annegret and Beekmann, Dustin and Eickhoff, Simon
                      and Grefkes, Christian and Tscherpel, Caroline and
                      Meyding-Lamadé, Uta and Bassa, Burc},
      title        = {{Q}ualitätsindikatoren künstliche {I}ntelligenz -
                      {Q}uality indicators artificial intelligence},
      journal      = {Der Nervenarzt},
      volume       = {95},
      issn         = {0028-2804},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-01161},
      pages        = {242-246},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {Kein Post-print verfügbar},
      abstract     = {The ability of some artificial intelligence (AI) systems to
                      autonomously evolve and the sometimes very limited
                      possibilities to comprehend their decision-making processes
                      present new challenges to our legal system. At a European
                      level this has led to reform efforts, of which the proposal
                      for a European AI regulation promises to close regulatory
                      gaps in existing product safety law through cross-sectoral
                      AI-specific safety requirements. A prerequisite, however,
                      would be that the EU legislator does not only avoid
                      duplications and contradictions with existing safety
                      requirements but also refrains from imposing exaggerated and
                      unattainable demands. If this were to be taken into
                      consideration, the new safety requirements could also be
                      used to specify the undefined standard of care in liability
                      law. Nevertheless, challenges in the context of provability
                      continue to remain unresolved, posing a risk of rendering
                      the legal protection efforts of the aggrieved party
                      ineffective. It remains to be seen whether the EU legislator
                      will address this need for reform with the recently proposed
                      reform of product liability law by the Commission.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525) / 5254 - Neuroscientific Data Analytics and AI
                      (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {38085285},
      UT           = {WOS:001127314200003},
      doi          = {10.1007/s00115-023-01573-6},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1022024},
}