% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Omidvarnia:1022086,
author = {Omidvarnia, Amir and Sasse, Leonard and Larabi, Daouia I.
and Raimondo, Federico and Hoffstaedter, Felix and Kasper,
Jan and Dukart, Juergen and Petersen, Marvin and Cheng,
Bastian and Thomalla, Götz and Eickhoff, Simon B. and
Patil, Kaustubh R.},
title = {{I}s resting state f{MRI} better than individual
characteristics at predicting cognition?},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-01223},
year = {2023},
abstract = {Resting state fMRI versus confounds for behavioral
phenotypic predictionIs resting state fMRI better than
individualcharacteristics at predicting cognition?Amir
Omidvarnia1,2*, Leonard Sasse1,2, Daouia I. Larabi1,2,
FedericoRaimondo1,2, Felix Hoffstaedter1,2, Jan Kasper1,2,
Juergen Dukart1,2,Marvin Petersen3, Bastian Cheng3, Götz
Thomalla3, Simon B. Eickhoff1,2,Kaustubh R.
Patil1,21Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain $\&$
Behavior (INM-7),Research Center Jülich,
Wilhelm-Johnen-Straße, Jülich, 52428, Germany2Institute of
Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich
HeineUniversity Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Düsseldorf,
40225, Germany3Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Kopf-
und Neurozentrum, UniversityMedical Center
Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany*Corresponding author(s).
Email(s): a.omidvarnia@fz-juelich.deAbstractChanges in
spontaneous brain activity at rest provide rich
informationabout behavior and cognition. The mathematical
properties of resting-statefunctional magnetic resonance
imaging (rsfMRI) are a depiction of brainfunction and are
frequently used to predict cognitive phenotypes.Individual
characteristics such as age, gender, and total intracranial
volume(TIV) play an important role in predictive modeling of
rsfMRI (for example,as "confounders" in many cases). It is
unclear, however, to what extentrsfMRI carries independent
information from the individual characteristicsthat is able
to predict cognitive phenotypes. Here, we used
predictivemodeling to thoroughly examine the predictability
of four cognitivephenotypes in 20,000 healthy UK Biobank
subjects. We extracted commonrsfMRI features of functional
brain connectivity (FC) and temporalcomplexity (TC). We
assessed the ability of these features to predictoutcomes in
the presence and absence of age, gender, and TIV.
Additionally,we assessed the predictiveness of age, gender,
and TIV only. We find TC andFC features to perform
comparably with regard to predicting cognitivephenotypes. As
compared to rsfMRI features, individual
characteristicsprovide systematically better predictions
with smaller sample sizes and, tosome extent, in larger
cohorts. It is also consistent across different levels
ofinherent temporal noise in rsfMRI. Our results suggest
that when theobjective is to perform cognitive predictions
as opposed to understandingthe relationship between brain
and behavior, individual characteristics aremore applicable
than rsfMRI features.},
cin = {INM-7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525) / 5254 - Neuroscientific
Data Analytics and AI (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5254},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)25},
doi = {10.1101/2023.02.18.529076},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1022086},
}