% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{DeLannoye:1022343,
      author       = {De Lannoye, Karen and Trettin, C. and Belt, Alexander and
                      Reinecke, Ernst-Arndt and Goertz, R. and Arnold, Lukas},
      title        = {{T}he influence of experimental conditions on the mass loss
                      for {TGA} in fire safety science},
      journal      = {Fire safety journal},
      volume       = {144},
      issn         = {0378-7761},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-01460},
      pages        = {104079 -},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {A thermogravimetric analyser (TGA) measures the mass loss
                      of a sample as function of temperature, during a predefined
                      heating program. The results are applied for developing
                      reaction kinetics in fire safety science. It is assumed that
                      the sample and the apparatus are in perfect thermal
                      equilibrium. Therefore, the analysis ignores any apparatus
                      or sample specific aspects. However, different experimental
                      and material parameters, like the reacting atmosphere or
                      sample mass, influence the observed mass loss. This research
                      work illustrates the impact of experimental and material
                      conditions on the measurement results. Polymethyl
                      methacrylate (PMMA) is used for this study because of its
                      important role in fire safety science. The influence of
                      different atmospheres, sample mass, colour and flow rates
                      was examined in three different TGA devices at heating rates
                      between 2 K/min and 80 K/min. The major difference was
                      observed for different atmospheres, inert versus synthetic
                      air atmosphere. A difference up to 75 °C in onset
                      temperature was found. The flow rate does not have any
                      influence under inert atmosphere. The colour of the samples
                      has a small influence on the mass loss rates. When comparing
                      different devices, it was found that the peak temperature
                      differs less than 10 °C under inert atmosphere. This
                      contribution discusses and compares the observed influence
                      of the different conditions.},
      cin          = {IAS-7 / IEK-14},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129},
      pnm          = {5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation $\&$ Data Life Cycle Labs
                      (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001165332500001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.104079},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1022343},
}