% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Wang:1023791,
author = {Wang, Mengmeng and Deng, Yao and Liu, Yingying and Suo, Tao
and Guo, Bowen and Eickhoff, Simon B. and Xu, Jing and Rao,
Hengyi},
title = {{T}he common and distinct brain basis associated with adult
and adolescent risk-taking behavior: {E}vidence from the
neuroimaging meta-analysis},
journal = {Neuroscience $\&$ biobehavioral reviews},
volume = {160},
issn = {0149-7634},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-01804},
pages = {105607 -},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Risk-taking is a common, complex, and multidimensional
behavior construct that has significant implications for
human health and well-being. Previous research has
identified the neural mechanisms underlying risk-taking
behavior in both adolescents and adults, yet the differences
between adolescents' and adults' risk-taking in the brain
remain elusive. This study firstly employs a comprehensive
meta-analysis approach that includes 73 adult and 20
adolescent whole-brain experiments, incorporating
observations from 1986 adults and 789 adolescents obtained
from online databases, including Web of Science, PubMed,
ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, EBSCO PsycINFO, Scopus,
Medline and PsycARTICLES. It then combines functional
decoding methods to identify common and distinct brain
regions and corresponding psychological processes associated
with risk-taking behavior in these two cohorts. The results
indicated that the neural bases underlying risk-taking
behavior in both age groups are situated within the
cognitive control, reward, and sensory networks. Subsequent
contrast analysis revealed that adolescents and adults
risk-taking engaged frontal pole within the fronto-parietal
control network (FPN), but the former recruited more
ventrolateral area and the latter recruited more
dorsolateral area. Moreover, adolescents' risk-taking evoked
brain area activity within the ventral attention network
(VAN) and the default mode network (DMN) compared with
adults, consistent with the functional decoding analyses.
These findings provide new insights into the similarities
and disparities of risk-taking neural substrates underlying
different age cohorts, supporting future neuroimaging
research on the dynamic changes of risk-taking.},
cin = {INM-7},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525) / 5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {38428473},
UT = {WOS:001218412000001},
doi = {10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105607},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1023791},
}