% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Boomers:1024672,
      author       = {Boomers, Ann Katrin and Boltes, Maik and Kersting, Uwe G.},
      title        = {{H}ow {A}pproaching {A}ngle, {B}ottleneck {W}idth and
                      {W}alking {S}peed {A}ffect the {U}se of a {B}ottleneck by
                      {I}ndividuals},
      journal      = {Sensors},
      volume       = {24},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {1424-8220},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-02345},
      pages        = {1720},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Understanding pedestrian dynamics at bottlenecks and how
                      pedestrians interact with their environment—particularly
                      how they use and move in the space available to them—is of
                      safety importance, since bottlenecks are a key point for
                      pedestrian flow. We performed a series of experiments in
                      which participants walked through a bottleneck individually
                      for varying combinations of approaching angle, bottleneck
                      width and walking speed, to investigate the dependence of
                      the movement on safety-relevant influencing factors.
                      Trajectories as well as 3D motion data were recorded for
                      every participant. This paper shows that (1) the maximum
                      amplitude of shoulder rotation is mainly determined by the
                      ratio of the bottleneck width to the shoulder width of the
                      participant, while the direction is determined by the
                      starting angle and the foot position; (2) the ‘critical
                      point’ is not invariant to the starting angle and walking
                      speed; (3) differences between the maximum and minimum speed
                      values arise mainly from the distribution of deceleration
                      patterns; and (4) the position of crossing shifts by 1.75
                      cm/10 cm, increasing the bottleneck width in the direction
                      of origin.},
      cin          = {IAS-7},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321},
      pnm          = {5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation $\&$ Data Life Cycle Labs
                      (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511) / Croma - Crowd
                      Management in Transport Infrastructures (BMBF-DB001534)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111 / G:(DE-Juel-1)BMBF-DB001534},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {38543984},
      UT           = {WOS:001192660400001},
      doi          = {10.3390/s24061720},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1024672},
}