% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Rathkopf:1024831,
      author       = {Rathkopf, Charles},
      title        = {{S}ome {B}enefits and {L}imitations of {M}odern {A}rgument
                      {M}ap {R}epresentation},
      journal      = {Argumentation},
      volume       = {38},
      issn         = {0920-427X},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-02497},
      pages        = {199–224},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Argument maps represent some arguments more effectively
                      than others. The goal of this article is to account for that
                      variability, so that those who wish to use argument maps can
                      do so with more foresight. I begin by identifying four
                      properties of argument maps that make them useful tools for
                      evaluating arguments. Then, I discuss four types of argument
                      that are difficult to map well: reductio ad absurdum
                      arguments, charges of equivocation, logical analogies, and
                      mathematical arguments. The difficulties presented by these
                      four types appear unrelated to one another, but I show that,
                      in each case, the difficulty can be traced back to the use
                      of metalinguistic reasoning. The need to represent a
                      transition between object language and metalanguage can
                      undermine one or more of the benefits that argument map
                      representation would otherwise confer.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {400},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001142857100001},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10503-023-09626-5},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1024831},
}