Home > Publications database > Co-assessment of costs and environmental impacts for off-grid direct air carbon capture and storage systems > print

001     1024996
005     20250512115734.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1038/s44172-023-00152-6
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-02590
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:001478238300001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2024-02590
100 1 _ |a Gutsch, Moritz
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)185648
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Co-assessment of costs and environmental impacts for off-grid direct air carbon capture and storage systems
260 _ _ |a [London]
|c 2024
|b Nature Publishing Group UK
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1717568292_30952
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Large-scale deployment of direct air carbon capture and storage (DACS) is required to offset CO2 emissions. To guide decision-making, a combined assessment of costs and environmental impacts for DACS systems is necessary. Here we present a cost model and life cycle assessment for several combinations of off-grid DACSs, powered by photovoltaic (PV) energy and heat pumps combined with battery storages to mitigate intermittency of the PV energy source. Utilization factors of DACSs are estimated for different locations, power of PV systems and battery capacities. We find that the cost optimal layout for a DACS in Nevada (USA) with a nominal CO2 removal capacity of 100,000tCO2 per year consists of 100 MW PV and 300MWh battery. Costs are $755 and $877 for gross and net removal of 1tCO2. The cost difference is explained by a carbon removal efficiency (CRE) of 88%. Of 16 evaluated environmental impact categories mineral resource use is most problematic. We conceive a dashboard which allows to track how changes to technical parameters, such as energy consumption or adsorbent degradation, impact costs, CRE and combined environmental impacts. In an optimized scenario and including tax credits, costs for net-removal of 1tCO2 will be $216 at a CRE of 93%.
536 _ _ |a 1221 - Fundamentals and Materials (POF4-122)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221
|c POF4-122
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Leker, Jens
|0 0000-0003-0237-691X
|b 1
773 _ _ |a 10.1038/s44172-023-00152-6
|g Vol. 3, no. 1, p. 14
|0 PERI:(DE-600)3121995-0
|n 1
|p 14
|t Communications engineering
|v 3
|y 2024
|x 2731-3395
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1024996/files/Co-assessment%20of%20costs%20and%20environmental%20impacts%20for%20off-grid%20direct%20air%20carbon%20capture%20and%20storage%20systems.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1024996/files/Co-assessment%20of%20costs%20and%20environmental%20impacts%20for%20off-grid%20direct%20air%20carbon%20capture%20and%20storage%20systems.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1024996/files/Co-assessment%20of%20costs%20and%20environmental%20impacts%20for%20off-grid%20direct%20air%20carbon%20capture%20and%20storage%20systems.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1024996/files/Co-assessment%20of%20costs%20and%20environmental%20impacts%20for%20off-grid%20direct%20air%20carbon%20capture%20and%20storage%20systems.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1024996/files/Co-assessment%20of%20costs%20and%20environmental%20impacts%20for%20off-grid%20direct%20air%20carbon%20capture%20and%20storage%20systems.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1024996
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)185648
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-122
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Elektrochemische Energiespeicherung
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a DOAJ Journal
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003
915 p c |a DEAL: Springer Nature 2020
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0113
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-09-03
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-09-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-05
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2024-04-10T15:36:47Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2024-04-10T15:36:47Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Anonymous peer review
|d 2024-04-10T15:36:47Z
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217
|k IEK-12
|l Helmholtz-Institut Münster Ionenleiter für Energiespeicher
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-4-20141217

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21