001025069 001__ 1025069
001025069 005__ 20250203103353.0
001025069 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1149/MA2023-012595mtgabs
001025069 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1091-8213
001025069 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2151-2043
001025069 037__ $$aFZJ-2024-02657
001025069 082__ $$a540
001025069 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHeidbuechel, Marcel$$b0
001025069 245__ $$aEnabling Aqueous Processing of Ni-Rich Layered Oxide Cathode Materials by Using Lithium Sulphate as Processing Additive
001025069 260__ $$aPennington, NJ$$bSoc.$$c2023
001025069 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
001025069 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
001025069 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1712825794_19457
001025069 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
001025069 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
001025069 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
001025069 500__ $$aHierbei handelt es sich lediglich um einen Abstract.
001025069 520__ $$aRoughly 75% of the cost for Lithium ion batteries are attributed to material cost for electrodes, electrolyte and separator. Furthermore, the production cost of the cathode material is responsible for >50% of the overall material cost. Therefore, technological breakthroughs for an increased energy density and decreased production cost along the whole battery value chain are urgently needed. State of the art (SOTA) cathode active materials (CAMs) are LiFePO4 (LFP) and layered oxides such as LiNi1-x-yCoxMnyO2 (NCM). By increasing the Ni content within NCM materials, the discharge capacity and therefore the energy density on material level can be gradually increased. Since a higher Ni content (>80% Ni) in NCM´s implicitly entails several challenges with respect to the material synthesis procedure, stability during electrode processing as well as life time, the broad commercialization of these CAMs still needs further advances.Aqueous processing of Ni-rich layered oxide cathode materials is a promising approach to simultaneously decrease electrode manufacturing costs, while bringing environmental benefits by substituting the SOTA, often toxic and expensive organic processing solvents. Furthermore, recycling of batteries and especially of the cathode material, will probably become an important topic in the coming years. The conversion of electrodes into black mass might be cheaper and easier for aqueously-processed cathodes (e.g., by using fluorine-free binders). However, an aqueous environment still remains challenging due to the high reactivity of Ni-rich layered oxides towards moisture, leading to surface reconstruction, lithium leaching and Al current collector corrosion due to the resulting high pH value of the aqueous electrode paste. Common approaches to suppress current collector corrosion are the protection of the Al current collector by a carbon coating or decreasing the pH value by using dilute acids. The latter approach, especially with phosphoric acid, might lead to formation of a phosphate coating at the surface of cathode particles, which is able to protect the NCM against further degradation.Herein, we present a facile method to enable aqueous processing of LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) by the addition of lithium sulphate (Li2SO4) during electrode paste dispersion. The aqueously-processed electrodes retain 80% of their initial capacity after 400 cycles in NCM811 || graphite full-cells, while electrodes processed without the addition of Li2SO4 reach 80% of their capacity after only 200 cycles. Furthermore, with regard to electrochemical performance, aqueously-processed electrodes using carbon-coated Al current collector outperform reference electrodes, based on SOTA production processes involving N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone as processing solvent and fluorinated binders. The positive impact on cycle life by the addition of Li2SO4 stems from a formed sulphate coating, protecting the NCM811 surface against degradation. Results reported herein open a new avenue for the processing of Ni-rich NCM electrodes using more sustainable aqueous routes.
001025069 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221$$a1221 - Fundamentals and Materials (POF4-122)$$cPOF4-122$$fPOF IV$$x0
001025069 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
001025069 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchultz, Thorsten$$b1
001025069 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKoch, Norbert$$b2
001025069 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchmuch, Richard$$b3
001025069 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGomez Martin, Aurora$$b4
001025069 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166130$$aWinter, Martin$$b5
001025069 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2438749-6$$a10.1149/MA2023-012595mtgabs$$gVol. MA2023-01, no. 2, p. 595 - 595$$n2$$p595 - 595$$tMeeting abstracts$$vMA2023-01$$x1091-8213$$y2023
001025069 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1025069$$pVDB
001025069 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)166130$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
001025069 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-122$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lMaterialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)$$vElektrochemische Energiespeicherung$$x0
001025069 9141_ $$y2024
001025069 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217$$kIEK-12$$lHelmholtz-Institut Münster Ionenleiter für Energiespeicher$$x0
001025069 980__ $$ajournal
001025069 980__ $$aVDB
001025069 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217
001025069 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
001025069 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IMD-4-20141217