001     1026510
005     20260122220049.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.1016/j.future.2024.05.005
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 0167-739X
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 1872-7115
024 7 _ |2 datacite_doi
|a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-03447
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:001247468300001
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2024-03447
082 _ _ |a 004
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Higashida, Aito
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Robustness evaluation of large-scale machine learning-based reduced order models for reproducing flow fields
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|b Elsevier Science
|c 2024
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1718109634_32316
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
520 _ _ |a The robustness of an artificial neural network that performs model order reduction for flow field data is studied. The network is trained with a large-scale distributed learning approach using up to 6,259 nodes of the supercomputer Fugaku. Flow around two square cylinders with a varying distance between their centers is investigated. The network is trained and tested with data from numerical simulations. First, the capability to reproduce flow fields with 2, 12, and 24 modes is investigated by comparing the reconstructed flow data to simulated data. It is shown, that reconstructions based on 2 modes cannot capture both, low- and high-frequency flow structures correctly, whereas predictions based on 12 and 24 modes yield improved flow fields, especially in the case of high-frequency waves in the vicinity of the square cylinders. Reconstructions with 24 modes provide smooth velocity fields that reproduce all relevant low- and high-frequency waves for all variations of the distance between the two square cylinders. Second, the performance of the machine learning-based reconstructions are compared to proper orthogonal decomposition, which is a commonly used reduced order model technique. The comparison only includes flow fields based on 24 modes. For all geometric variations, the mean squared errors of the reconstructions by the conventional method are higher than those of the machine learning model. This underlines the advantage of artificial neural networks over linear methods like proper orthogonal decomposition for tasks like reconstructing flow fields that are characterized by non-linear governing equations.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|a 5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)
|c POF4-511
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(EU-Grant)951733
|a RAISE - Research on AI- and Simulation-Based Engineering at Exascale (951733)
|c 951733
|f H2020-INFRAEDI-2019-1
|x 1
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)JLESC-20150708
|a JLESC - Joint Laboratory for Extreme Scale Computing (JLESC-20150708)
|c JLESC-20150708
|f JLESC
|x 2
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel-1)SDLFSE
|a SDL Fluids & Solids Engineering
|c SDLFSE
|x 3
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Ando, Kazuto
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)177985
|a Rüttgers, Mario
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165948
|a Lintermann, Andreas
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Tsubokura, Makoto
|b 4
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2020551-X
|a 10.1016/j.future.2024.05.005
|g Vol. 159, p. 243 - 254
|p 243 - 254
|t Future generation computer systems
|v 159
|x 0167-739X
|y 2024
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1026510/files/1-s2.0-S0167739X24002176-main-2.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1026510/files/1-s2.0-S0167739X24002176-main-2.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1026510/files/1-s2.0-S0167739X24002176-main-2.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1026510/files/1-s2.0-S0167739X24002176-main-2.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1026510/files/1-s2.0-S0167739X24002176-main-2.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1026510
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)177985
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 2
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)165948
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 3
|k FZJ
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-511
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-510
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Engineering Digital Futures – Supercomputing, Data Management and Information Security for Knowledge and Action
|v Enabling Computational- & Data-Intensive Science and Engineering
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 _ _ |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
|a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
|a OpenAccess
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-08-19
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
|b FUTURE GENER COMP SY : 2022
|d 2024-12-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2024-12-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|a IF >= 5
|b FUTURE GENER COMP SY : 2022
|d 2024-12-17
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
|k JSC
|l Jülich Supercomputing Center
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21