% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Shao:1026648,
author = {Shao, Zeqiang and Zheng, Congcong and Postma, Johannes Auke
and Gao, Qiang and Zhang, Jinjing},
title = {{M}ore {N} fertilizer, more maize, and less alfalfa: maize
benefits from its higher {N} uptake per unit root length},
journal = {Frontiers in Functional Plant Ecology},
volume = {15},
issn = {1664-462X},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {FZJ-2024-03484},
pages = {1338521},
year = {2024},
abstract = {Root plasticity is fundamental to soil nutrient acquisition
and maximizing production. Different soil nitrogen (N)
levels affect root development, aboveground dry matter
accumulation, and N uptake. This phenotypic plasticity is
well documented for single plants and specific monocultures
but is much less understood in intercrops in which species
compete for the available nutrients. Consequently, the study
tested whether the plasticity of plant roots, biomass and N
accumulation under different N levels in maize/alfalfa
intercropping systems differs quantitatively. Maize and
alfalfa were intercropped for two consecutive years in large
soil-filled rhizoboxes and fertilized with 6 different
levels of N fertilizer (0, 75, 150, 225, 270, and 300 kg
ha-1). Root length, root surface area, specific root length,
N uptake and yield were all increased in maize with
increasing fertilizer level, whereas higher N rates were
supraoptimal. Alfalfa had an optimal N rate of 75-150 kg
ha-1, likely because the competition from maize became more
severe at higher rates. Maize responded more strongly to the
fertilizer treatment in the second year when the alfalfa
biomass was much larger. N fertilization contributes more to
maize than alfalfa growth via root plasticity responses. Our
results suggest that farmers can maximize intercropping
yield and economic return by optimizing N fertilizer
management.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
sustainable use (POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {38384755},
UT = {WOS:001169067800001},
doi = {10.3389/fpls.2024.1338521},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1026648},
}