% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Wu:1027072,
      author       = {Wu, Zhenni and Sytnyk, Mykhailo and Zhang, Jiyun and
                      Babayeva, Gulusum and Kupfer, Christian and Hu, Jin and
                      Arnold, Simon and Hauch, Jens and Brabec, Christoph and
                      Peters, Ian Marius},
      title        = {{C}losing the loop: recycling of {MAP}b{I} 3 perovskite
                      solar cells},
      journal      = {Energy $\&$ environmental science},
      volume       = {17},
      issn         = {1754-5692},
      address      = {Cambridge},
      publisher    = {RSC Publ.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-03625},
      pages        = {4248-4262},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Closed-loop recycling is crucial in the rapidly expanding
                      era of photovoltaic deployment. Yet, the recycling of
                      commercial silicon photovoltaic modules presents challenges
                      due to laborious component separation. In contrast, layers
                      in solution-processed solar cells can be separated with
                      relative ease through selective dissolution. In this study,
                      we report on the recovery of every layer in a planar MAPbI3
                      perovskite solar cell using a layer-by-layer solvent
                      extraction approach, followed by purification or
                      modification to restore quality. This method potentially
                      allows for up to $99.97\%$ recycled mass, thereby conserving
                      resources and reducing waste. We assessed material quality
                      by substituting each fresh material with its recycled
                      equivalent during solar cell production. Subsequently, solar
                      cells were fabricated with either several or all layers
                      comprising recycled materials. Every combination yielded
                      efficiency comparable to cells constructed exclusively with
                      fresh materials, demonstrating the efficacy of the developed
                      recycling process. Our mass and value analysis highlights
                      ITO glass has the highest recycling priority and the need
                      for circular utilization for by-product chemicals,
                      especially cleaning agents. Techno-economic projections
                      suggest that the proposed recycling procedure has the
                      potential to afford substantial cost savings. In the lab,
                      recycling could reduce material costs by up to $63.7\%,$ in
                      industrial manufacturing by up to $61.4\%.$ A life cycle
                      assessment reveals this recycling method can reduce
                      environmental impacts.},
      cin          = {IEK-11},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-11-20140314},
      pnm          = {1213 - Cell Design and Development (POF4-121)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1213},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001233441300001},
      doi          = {10.1039/D4EE01071J},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1027072},
}