## <img src="/Images/Icons/magnifying_glass.png" width="200" height="200" />
##References

> *Note:* This bibliography is collaboratively maintained by the *Open Science Training Handbook* community at https://www.zotero.org/groups/2114699/open_science_book/items/collectionKey/XIUNJBME. 

Balasegaram, Manica, Peter Kolb, John McKew, Jaykumar Menon, Piero Olliaro,
Tomasz Sablinski, Zakir Thomas, Matthew H. Todd, Els Torreele, and John
Wilbanks. ‘An Open Source Pharma Roadmap’. *PLOS Medicine* 14, no. 4 (18 April
2017): e1002276. https://doi.org/10/gbrb4b.

Barba, Lorena A. ‘Terminologies for Reproducible Research’. *ArXiv:1802.03311
[Cs]*, 9 February 2018. http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03311.

Barnes, Nick. ‘Publish Your Computer Code: It Is Good Enough’. *Nature* 467, no.
7317 (14 October 2010): 753–753. https://doi.org/10/cj8t6n.

Björk, Bo-Christer, Patrik Welling, Mikael Laakso, Peter Majlender, Turid
Hedlund, and Guðni Guðnason. ‘Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature:
Situation 2009’. *PLOS ONE* 5, no. 6 (23 June 2010): e11273.
https://doi.org/10/csjg36.

Blackmore, Paul, and Camille B. Kandiko. ‘Motivation in Academic Life: A
Prestige Economy’. *Research in Post-Compulsory Education* 16, no. 4 (1 December
2011): 399–411. https://doi.org/10/fqrkft.

Buckheit, Jonathan B., and David L. Donoho. ‘WaveLab and Reproducible Research’.
In *Wavelets and Statistics*, edited by Anestis Antoniadis and Georges
Oppenheim, 103:55–81. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1995.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2544-7_5.

Christodoulou, Michail, Stefanos Kachrilas, Ahmed Dina, Andreas Bourdoumis,
Junaid Masood, Noor Buchholz, and Athanasios Papatsoris. ‘How to Conduct a
Successful Workshop: The Trainees’ Perspective’. *Arab Journal of Urology*,
Teaching and Training in Urology, 12, no. 1 (1 March 2014): 12–14.
https://doi.org/10/gcbmkm.

Cobb, Matthew. ‘The Prehistory of Biology Preprints: A Forgotten Experiment from
the 1960s’. PeerJ Inc., 22 August 2017.
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3174v1.

Crosas, Mercè. ‘Joint Declaration of Data Citation Principles - FINAL’. FORCE11,
30 October 2013. https://www.force11.org/datacitationprinciples.

Dryden, Michael D. M., Ryan Fobel, Christian Fobel, and Aaron R. Wheeler. ‘Upon
the Shoulders of Giants: Open-Source Hardware and Software in Analytical
Chemistry’. *Analytical Chemistry* 89, no. 8 (18 April 2017): 4330–38.
https://doi.org/10/gc5sjm.

Goodman, Steven N., Daniele Fanelli, and John P. A. Ioannidis. ‘What Does
Research Reproducibility Mean?’ *Science Translational Medicine* 8, no. 341 (1
June 2016): 341ps12-341ps12. https://doi.org/10/gc5sjs.

Haklay, Muki. ‘Citizen Science and Policy: A European Perspective’. *Washington,
DC*, February 2015, 76.

Ince, Darrel C., Leslie Hatton, and John Graham-Cumming. ‘The Case for Open
Computer Programs’. *Nature* 482, no. 7386 (22 February 2012): 485–88.
https://doi.org/10/hqg.

Iskoujina, Zilia, and Joanne Roberts. ‘Knowledge Sharing in Open Source Software
Communities: Motivations and Management’. *Journal of Knowledge Management* 19,
no. 4 (13 July 2015): 791–813. https://doi.org/10/f7htj8.

Jahn, Najko, and Marco Tullney. ‘A Study of Institutional Spending on Open
Access Publication Fees in Germany’. *PeerJ* 4 (9 August 2016): e2323.
https://doi.org/10/bnqm.

Jiménez, Rafael C., Mateusz Kuzak, Monther Alhamdoosh, Michelle Barker, Bérénice
Batut, Mikael Borg, Salvador Capella-Gutierrez, et al. ‘Four Simple
Recommendations to Encourage Best Practices in Research Software [Version 1;
Referees: 3 Approved]’. *F1000Research* 6 (13 June 2017): 876.
https://doi.org/10/gbp2wh.

Knowles, Malcolm S, Elwood F Holton, and Richard A Swanson. *The Adult Learner:
The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development.*
Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011.

Kreutzer, Till. ‘Validity of the Creative Commons Zero 1.0 Universal Public
Do-Main Dedication and Its Usability for Bibliographic Metadata from the
Perspective of German Copyright Law’, 2011.
https://www.rd-alliance.org/sites/default/files/cc0-analysis-kreuzer.pdf.

LEARN. *LEARN Toolkit of Best Practice for Research Data Management*. Edited by
LEARN. Leaders Activating Research Networks (LEARN), 2017.
http://dx.doi.org/10.14324/000.learn.00.

Lionelli, Sabina. ‘Implementing Open Science: Strategies, Experiences and
Models’. Thematic Report. Mutual Learning Exercise: Open Science – Altmetrics
and Rewards. European Commission, n.d.
https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/library/mle-open-science-altmetrics-and-rewards-%E2%80%93-implementing-open-science-strategies-experiences.

Lowndes, Julia S. Stewart, Benjamin D. Best, Courtney Scarborough, Jamie C.
Afflerbach, Melanie R. Frazier, Casey C. O’Hara, Ning Jiang, and Benjamin S.
Halpern. ‘Our Path to Better Science in Less Time Using Open Data Science
Tools’. *Nature Ecology & Evolution* 1, no. 6 (23 May 2017): 0160.
https://doi.org/10/gc4jb3.

Martinez-Torres, M.R., and M.C. Diaz-Fernandez. ‘Current Issues and Research
Trends on Open-Source Software Communities’. *Technology Analysis & Strategic
Management* 26, no. 1 (2 January 2014): 55–68. https://doi.org/10/gc5sjj.

McKiernan, Erin C, Philip E Bourne, C Titus Brown, Stuart Buck, Amye Kenall,
Jennifer Lin, Damon McDougall, et al. ‘How Open Science Helps Researchers
Succeed’. *ELife* 5 (7 July 2016). https://doi.org/10/gbqsng.

McQuilton, Peter, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Milo
Thurston, Allyson Lister, Eamonn Maguire, and Susanna-Assunta Sansone.
‘BioSharing: Curated and Crowd-Sourced Metadata Standards, Databases and Data
Policies in the Life Sciences’. *Database* 2016 (1 January 2016).
https://doi.org/10/f8wzmc.

Morin, A., J. Urban, P. D. Adams, I. Foster, A. Sali, D. Baker, and P. Sliz.
‘Shining Light into Black Boxes’. *Science* 336, no. 6078 (13 April 2012):
159–60. https://doi.org/10/m5t.

Munafò, Marcus R., Brian A. Nosek, Dorothy V. M. Bishop, Katherine S. Button,
Christopher D. Chambers, Nathalie Percie du Sert, Uri Simonsohn, Eric-Jan
Wagenmakers, Jennifer J. Ware, and John P. A. Ioannidis. ‘A Manifesto for
Reproducible Science’. *Nature Human Behaviour* 1, no. 1 (January 2017): 0021.
https://doi.org/10/bw28.

Niemeyer, Kyle E., Arfon M. Smith, and Daniel S. Katz. ‘The Challenge and
Promise of Software Citation for Credit, Identification, Discovery, and Reuse’.
*Journal of Data and Information Quality* 7, no. 4 (6 October 2016): 1–5.
https://doi.org/10/gc5sjd.

Oishi, Jeffrey S., Benjamin P. Brown, Keaton J. Burns, Daniel Lecoanet, and
Geoffrey M. Vasil. ‘Perspectives on Reproducibility and Sustainability of
Open-Source Scientific Software from Seven Years of the Dedalus Project’.
arXiv:1801.08200 [astro-ph.IM], 24 January 2018.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08200.

Pavelin, Katrina, Sangya Pundir, and Jennifer A. Cham. ‘Ten Simple Rules for
Running Interactive Workshops’. *PLOS Computational Biology* 10, no. 2 (27
February 2014): e1003485. https://doi.org/10/gc5sjq.

Picarra, Mafalda, and Alma Swan. ‘Monitoring Compliance with Open Access
Policies’, December 2015. http://pasteur4oa.eu/resources/162\#.WoL40Z_iZhF.

Piwowar, Heather, Jason Priem, Vincent Larivière, Juan Pablo Alperin, Lisa
Matthias, Bree Norlander, Ashley Farley, Jevin West, and Stefanie Haustein. ‘The
State of OA: A Large-Scale Analysis of the Prevalence and Impact of Open Access
Articles’. *PeerJ* 6 (13 February 2018): e4375. https://doi.org/10/ckh5.

‘Point of View: How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed’, n.d.
https://doi.org/10/gc5sjc.

Pontika, Nancy, Petr Knoth, Matteo Cancellieri, and Samuel Pearce. ‘Fostering
Open Science to Research Using a Taxonomy and an ELearning Portal’. In
*Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and
Data-Driven Business*, 11:1–11:8. I-KNOW ’15. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809571.

Prins, Pjotr, Joep de Ligt, Artem Tarasov, Ritsert C Jansen, Edwin Cuppen, and
Philip E Bourne. ‘Toward Effective Software Solutions for Big Biology’. *Nature
Biotechnology* 33, no. 7 (July 2015): 686–87. https://doi.org/10/f3mn4p.

Ross-Hellauer, Tony. ‘What Is Open Peer Review? A Systematic Review [Version 2;
Referees: 4 Approved]’. *F1000Research* 6 (31 August 2017): 588.
https://doi.org/10/gc5sjh.

Sandve, Geir Kjetil, Anton Nekrutenko, James Taylor, and Eivind Hovig. ‘Ten
Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research’. Edited by Philip E.
Bourne. *PLoS Computational Biology* 9, no. 10 (24 October 2013): e1003285.
https://doi.org/10/pjb.

Scacchi, Walt. ‘The Future of Research in Free/Open Source Software
Development’. In *Proceedings of the FSE/SDP Workshop on Future of Software
Engineering Research - FoSER’10*, 315. Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA: ACM Press, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1145/1882362.1882427.

Scopatz, Anthony, and Kathryn D. Huff. *Effective Computation in Physics: Field
Guide to Research in Python*. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, 2015.

Sewell, Claire. ‘Research Data Management: Activity Cards’, 23 November 2017.
https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.10074.

Shamir, Lior, John F. Wallin, Alice Allen, Bruce Berriman, Peter Teuben, Robert
J. Nemiroff, Jessica Mink, Robert J. Hanisch, and Kimberly DuPrie. ‘Practices in
Source Code Sharing in Astrophysics’. *Astronomy and Computing* 1 (February
2013): 54–58. https://doi.org/10/gc5sjk.

Smith, Arfon M., Daniel S. Katz, Kyle E. Niemeyer, and FORCE11 Software Citation
Working Group. ‘Software Citation Principles’. *PeerJ Computer Science* 2 (19
September 2016): e86. https://doi.org/10/bw3g.

Smith, Arfon M., Kyle E. Niemeyer, Daniel S. Katz, Lorena A. Barba, George
Githinji, Melissa Gymrek, Kathryn D. Huff, et al. ‘Journal of Open Source
Software (JOSS): Design and First-Year Review’. *PeerJ Computer Science* 4 (12
February 2018): e147. https://doi.org/10/gc5sjf.

Soergel, David A. W. ‘Rampant Software Errors May Undermine Scientific Results
[Version 2; Referees: 2 Approved]’. *F1000Research* 3 (2015): 303.
https://doi.org/10/gc5sjg.

Steinmacher, Igor, Marco Aurelio Graciotto Silva, Marco Aurelio Gerosa, and
David F. Redmiles. ‘A Systematic Literature Review on the Barriers Faced by
Newcomers to Open Source Software Projects’. *Information and Software
Technology* 59 (March 2015): 67–85. https://doi.org/10/f6z643.

Stodden, Victoria. ‘The Scientific Method in Practice: Reproducibility in the
Computational Sciences’. *SSRN Electronic Journal*, 2010.
https://doi.org/10/fzmph2.

Union, Publications Office of the European. ‘Evaluation of Research Careers
Fully Acknowledging Open Science Practices : Rewards, Incentives and/or
Recognition for Researchers Practicing Open Science.’ Website, 14 November 2017.
https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/47a3a330-c9cb-11e7-8e69-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.

Vandewalle, Patrick. ‘Code Sharing Is Associated with Research Impact in Image
Processing’. *Computing in Science & Engineering* 14, no. 4 (July 2012): 42–47.
https://doi.org/10/gc5sjp.

Vicente-Saez, Ruben, and Clara Martinez-Fuentes. ‘Open Science Now: A Systematic
Literature Review for an Integrated Definition’. *Journal of Business Research*,
January 2018. https://doi.org/10/gc5sjb.

Wicherts, Jelte M., Coosje L. S. Veldkamp, Hilde E. M. Augusteijn, Marjan
Bakker, Robbie C. M. van Aert, and Marcel A. L. M. van Assen. ‘Degrees of
Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A
Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking’. *Frontiers in Psychology* 7 (2016): 1832.
https://doi.org/10/gc5sjn.

Wilkinson, Mark D., Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle
Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, et al. ‘The FAIR Guiding
Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship’. *Scientific Data*,
15 March 2016. https://doi.org/10/bdd4.

Wilson, Greg. ‘Software Carpentry: Lessons Learned [Version 2; Referees: 3
Approved]’. *F1000Research* 3 (2016): 62. https://doi.org/10/gc5sjr.

Wilson, Greg, Jennifer Bryan, Karen Cranston, Justin Kitzes, Lex Nederbragt, and
Tracy K. Teal. ‘Good Enough Practices in Scientific Computing’. Edited by
Francis Ouellette. *PLOS Computational Biology* 13, no. 6 (22 June 2017):
e1005510. https://doi.org/10/gbkbwp.

Wilson, Paul M., Mark Petticrew, Mike W. Calnan, and Irwin Nazareth.
‘Disseminating Research Findings: What Should Researchers Do? A Systematic
Scoping Review of Conceptual Frameworks’. *Implementation Science* 5 (22
November 2010): 91. https://doi.org/10/cprfmr.

Wilson, Paul M, Mark Petticrew, Mike W Calnan, and Irwin Nazareth.
‘Disseminating Research Findings: What Should Researchers Do? A Systematic
Scoping Review of Conceptual Frameworks’. *Implementation Science* 5, no. 1
(December 2010). https://doi.org/10/cprfmr.
