% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@INPROCEEDINGS{Atay:1027495,
      author       = {Atay, Melvin Selim and Bottenhorn, Katherine L},
      title        = {{A}ddressing {I}nclusivity in {O}pen {S}cience},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-03904},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {The goals of open science are, broadly, to democratize
                      access and to promote good research practices.
                      Unfortunately, these goals fall short in several key ways,
                      at the center of which are equity, diversity, and
                      inclusivity (EDI) not only of the community, but of the
                      fruits of their labors. Historically, the open science
                      movement has been dominated by a narrow demographic with the
                      access and support (institutional and otherwise) to time and
                      resources they can spend on “open science” efforts. This
                      monolithic culture has been furthered by (1) a gravitation
                      of open science efforts on technical solutions and valuation
                      of technical skills and (2) a reliance on computational
                      resources that are inaccessible to a large proportion of the
                      globe. While the community has become more diverse in the
                      past few years, there is still a long way to go and the
                      products of open science remain sequestered in the global
                      North. Furthermore, EDI disparities have been highlighted by
                      continuing socio-economic issues, recent increases in
                      related scholarship, and the COVID-19 pandemic, revealing
                      that our science isn’t as open as it should be. From
                      culture to reachability, accessibility, there remains a lot
                      of room for improvement. Failure in achieving EDI goals, not
                      only hinders science, but imposes clear limitations and
                      biases in the voices around us and the knowledge we produce.
                      Science benefits from diversity in perspectives,
                      experiences, and beliefs, in addition to accessible tools
                      and reproducible research practices. New ways of thinking,
                      understanding and learning are needed, new ways of
                      establishing inclusion as a culture is needed to encourage
                      and include historically underrepresented people, without
                      such practices open science would not be as open as it
                      should be.},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
      doi          = {10.5281/ZENODO.4787551},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1027495},
}