% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@TECHREPORT{Grigorov:1028374,
      author       = {Grigorov, Ivo and Carvalho, Jose and Ball, David and
                      Bjørnshauge, Lars and Cancillieri, Matthew and Davidson,
                      Joy and Dazy, Andre and Donnelly, Martin and Franck, Gwen
                      and Hjubers, Leon and Jones, Sarah and Knoth, Peter and
                      Kuchma, Iryna and Melero, Reme and North, Dan and Orth,
                      Astrid and Pontika, Nancy and Reilly, Susan and Rodrigues,
                      Eloy and Schmidt, Birgitt and Swan, Alma},
      title        = {{F}oster {O}pen {S}cience {L}earning {O}bjectives},
      publisher    = {Zenodo},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-04555},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {EXECUTIVE Summary This brief outlines simplified Open
                      Science Learning Objectives for the main stakeholders in the
                      Research Ecosystem. Learning Objectives are structured by
                      Open Science Topics according to a functional Open Science
                      Taxonomy (Pontica et al., 2015), that accompany the main
                      responsibilities of each stakeholders along the Research
                      Lifecycle. The ultimate objective is to support the
                      integration of Open Science best practices into the daily
                      routine of performing and supporting research, to underpin
                      implementation of Horizon 2020 Mandate on Access to
                      Scientific Information, and augment the “societal
                      impact” and uptake of research, for the benefit of all
                      stakeholders in the knowledge creation process (ultimately
                      underpinning “co-creation”). Specific Learning
                      Objectives are structured in increasing level of competence,
                      frequently ending with successful integration of Open
                      Science best practices in the daily research routine,
                      facilitating self-assessment of the personal workflow. The
                      Learning Objectives can provide a backbone for a structured
                      learning plan for Doctoral Schools with the ambition to
                      train future researchers in optimizing their societal
                      impact, alongside research excellence training, as well as
                      preparing graduates for new and emerging research impact
                      measures and criteria. Support with relevant training
                      content will be provided in parallel through the FOSTER
                      Portal and accompanying e-Learning and self-learning
                      modules. The brief draws on FP7 FOSTER Work Packages 2
                      Content, WP3 Portal (Open Science Taxonomy, and learning
                      portal infrastructure) and WP4 Training (Deliverable D4.5
                      Training ToolKit).   RATIONALE: The political drive for
                      Open Science from the funding agency (EC[1]) point of view
                      is mainly Return On Investment (ROI), ethics (taxpayer
                      access to public funded research), and stimulating Open
                      Innovation[2] through free-flow of ideas in order to boost
                      economic growth through transfer of knowledge to the
                      knowledge-based Small/Medium Enterprises (SMEs). The Open
                      Science community of advocates and practitioners a diverse
                      one, spanning the full breadth of research disciplines, as
                      well as a range of stakeholders with various vested
                      interests and roles in the research process. The cumulative
                      effect is that there is a rich diversity of strong reasons
                      for and against making “Open Science” the default
                      setting in the research process. Consultation by FP7 FOSTER
                      of 90 researchers from various disciplines (Fig. 1;
                      attendees of the EuroScience Open Forum, Copenhagen 2014 [1]
                      ) lists reasons in favour: ethics, return on investment,
                      societal impact, transparency, rigor and reproducibility;
                      and objections: national security, patient data,
                      confidential data, patent exploitation [2] . Although most
                      are valid, it is beyond the scope of FP7 FOSTER to provide
                      the definitive summary of training content, or learning
                      objectives, in order to address such a diversity of
                      discipline-specific cases, and arguments. The objective of
                      this document is to support the implementation of the
                      Horizon 2020 Mandate, and focus on research data and
                      knowledge at the time of generation, by:   (1) reducing the
                      arguments in favour of adopting Open Science practices to
                      those lowest common denominators that are most
                      Target-centric and discipline-agnostic and offer the highest
                      scalling capacity beyond the lifetime of FP7 FOSTER, (2)
                      listing the minimal competencies per Target Group required
                      to comply with the Horizon 2020 Mandate and fully capitalize
                      on Open Science potential , in the form of modular Learning
                      Objectives, with gradually increasing level of
                      understanding, and (3) support these Learning Objectives
                      with minimum critical (not exhaustive!) content (WP2 Content
                      Mapping), e-infrastructure (WP3 Portal) and actual Training
                      ToolKit $\&$ HelpDesk support (WP4 Training). The document
                      is based on significant feedback from attendees and
                      organizers of FP7 FOSTER Calendar of Training Events
                      throughout 2014 and 2015, that informs the formulation of
                      the learning objectives below [3] .   [1] Thorhauge, Thomas
                      et al., 2014. Should Science Always be OPEN?, DOI
                      10.5281/zenodo.10658 [2] Guidelines on Data Management in
                      Horizon 2020 http://ec.europa.eu/research/.../ data /ref/...
                      pilot /h2020-hi-oa- data $-mgt_en.pdf$ [3] FOSTER Events
                      https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/events   [1] EC Open
                      Science Agenda
                      https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/open-science [2] ERA
                      of Innovation
                      http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2015/era-of-innovation/index.cfm},
      keywords     = {open science (Other) / return on investment (Other) /
                      learning objectives (Other) / graduate training (Other) /
                      graduate skills (Other) / soft skills (Other) / societal
                      impact (Other) / REF (Other)},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)29},
      doi          = {10.5281/zenodo.15603},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1028374},
}