Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Impact of weather patterns and meteorological factors on PM 2.5 and O 3 responses to the COVID-19 lockdown in China > print

001     1028493
005     20250204113907.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/acp-24-6539-2024
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1680-7316
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1680-7324
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 10.34734/FZJ-2024-04645
|2 datacite_doi
024 7 _ |a WOS:001239202700001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2024-04645
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Shen, Fuzhen
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)194205
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Impact of weather patterns and meteorological factors on PM 2.5 and O 3 responses to the COVID-19 lockdown in China
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2024
|b EGU
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1731665128_6495
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Haze events in the North China Plain (NCP) and a decline in ozone levels in Southern Coast China (SC) from 21 January to 9 February 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown have attracted public curiosity and scholarly attention. Most previous studies focused on the impact of atmospheric chemistry processes associated with anomalous weather elements in these cases, but fewer studies quantified the impact of various weather elements within the context of a specific weather pattern. To identify the weather patterns responsible for inducing this unexpected situation and to further quantify the importance of different meteorological factors during the haze event, two approaches are employed. These approaches implemented the comparisons of observations in 2020 with climatology averaged over the years 2015–2019 with a novel structural SOM (self-organising map) model and with the prediction of the “business as usual” (hereafter referred to as BAU) emission strength by the GBM (gradient-boosting machine) model, respectively. The results reveal that the unexpected PM2.5 pollution and O3 decline from the climatology in NCP and SC could be effectively explained by the presence of a double-centre high-pressure system across China. Moreover, the GBM results provided a quantitative assessment of the importance of each meteorological factor in driving the predictions of PM2.5 and O3 under the specific weather system. These results indicate that temperature played the most crucial role in the haze event in NCP, as well as in the O3 change in SC. This valuable information will ultimately contribute to our ability to predict air pollution under future emission scenarios and changing weather patterns that may be influenced by climate change.
536 _ _ |a 2112 - Climate Feedbacks (POF4-211)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112
|c POF4-211
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
650 2 7 |a Geosciences
|0 V:(DE-MLZ)SciArea-140
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Hegglin, Michaela I.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)192244
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Yuan, Yue
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)166383
|b 2
|e Collaboration author
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/acp-24-6539-2024
|g Vol. 24, no. 11, p. 6539 - 6553
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1
|n 11
|p 6539 - 6553
|t Atmospheric chemistry and physics
|v 24
|y 2024
|x 1680-7316
856 4 _ |u https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6539-2024
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1028493/files/acp-24-6539-2024.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1028493/files/acp-24-6539-2024.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1028493/files/acp-24-6539-2024.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1028493/files/acp-24-6539-2024.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1028493/files/acp-24-6539-2024.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1028493
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)194205
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)192244
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-211
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Die Atmosphäre im globalen Wandel
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2024
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Open peer review
|d 2022-12-20T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2023-08-23
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2024-12-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2024-12-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2024-12-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2024-12-21
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2024-12-21
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
|k IEK-7
|l Stratosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21