% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Jablonowski:1028708,
      author       = {Jablonowski, Nicolai David and Ohrem, Benedict and Gitzen,
                      Michael and Kollmann, Tobias},
      title        = {{C}onverting an {E}stablished {S}ida hermaphrodita {F}ield
                      into {A}rable {F}arming},
      journal      = {Agronomy},
      volume       = {14},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {2073-4395},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-04765},
      pages        = {411 -},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {The long-term performance of perennial energy crops and
                      their elimination is important for long-term planning and
                      use of agricultural land. In this study, the elimination of
                      a six-year-old Sida hermaphrodita (hereafter referred to as
                      Sida) stock for agricultural reclamation was investigated
                      over three years. Crop rotation using maize, winter wheat,
                      and sugar beet, a catch crop, as well as
                      mechanical–chemical treatments were employed according to
                      agricultural practices. After soil grubbing at the beginning
                      of the experiment and prior to further treatments, on half
                      of the former Sida planting area, visible Sida roots were
                      manually removed in addition to determining their potential
                      effect on total resprouting. Prior to each crop harvest,
                      resprouted Sida plants were counted. At harvest, by the end
                      of the first year, 476 versus 390 resprouted Sida plants
                      were found in the investigated areas of 315 m2 each, where
                      preceding manual root removal either took place or not,
                      respectively. This accounted for $76\%$ and $62\%$ of the
                      initial Sida planted. In the second year, the overall number
                      of resprouted Sida declined significantly, accounting for 15
                      and 11 plants (i.e., $2.4\%$ and $1.8\%$ of initially
                      planted), and in the third year, only two and four residual
                      plants (i.e., $0.3\%$ and $0.6\%)$ were found, representing
                      an almost $100\%$ Sida elimination rate. We conclude that
                      additional root removal did not result in a significant
                      difference in Sida regrowth compared to the
                      mechanical–chemical treatments only. No impediments to
                      harvesting and no loss of yield in any crops were observed
                      due to resprouted Sida in the existing field crops. No Sida
                      plants were found outside the initial field, indicating a
                      low dispersion potential and invasiveness. The results show
                      that successful recultivation of an established Sida stock
                      is possible through common agricultural practices and that
                      resprouting Sida plants did not negatively affect the
                      subsequent crops.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {640},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
                      sustainable use (POF4-217)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001195806500001},
      doi          = {10.3390/agronomy14030411},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1028708},
}