% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{vonCossel:1028709,
      author       = {von Cossel, Moritz and Heinzel, Kathleen and Patiño
                      Lordello, Gabriela and Aron Winkler, Andreas and Lauria,
                      Maria Virginia and Gandamalla, Gawasker and Jablonowski,
                      Nicolai David},
      title        = {{E}xploring the {P}otential of {P}erennial
                      {N}ectar‐{P}roducing {W}ild {P}lants for {P}ellet
                      {C}ombustion},
      journal      = {Advanced sustainable systems},
      volume       = {8},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {2366-7486},
      address      = {Weinheim},
      publisher    = {Wiley-VCH},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2024-04766},
      pages        = {2300599},
      year         = {2024},
      abstract     = {Perennial nectar-producing wild plant species (WPS)
                      cultivation for biogas production helps improve ecosystem
                      services such as habitat functioning, erosion mitigation,
                      groundwater protection, and carbon sequestration. These
                      ecosystem services could be improved when WPS are harvested
                      in late winter to produce pellets and briquettes as solid
                      energy carriers for heat production. This study aims for
                      gaining first insights into the use of WPS biomass as
                      resource for pellet and briquette combustion with focus on
                      two perennial WPS common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.) and
                      mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.), and two biennial WPS yellow
                      melilot (Melilotus officinalis L.) and wild teasel (Dipsacus
                      fullonum L.). All WPS are found economically viable for
                      pellet combustion. The main drivers are i) low cultivation
                      costs, ii) subsidies, and iii) low pellet production costs
                      due to low moisture contents. However, high ash contents in
                      WPS biomass justify the need of i) blending with
                      woody-biomass or ii) supplementing with additives to attain
                      international standards for household stoves. This approach
                      appears technically feasible providing a research field with
                      significant potential impacts. As $70\%$ of the pellet
                      market is demanded as household level, public concern about
                      the legal framework of alternative plant biomass pellets
                      must be overcome to develop this market.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
                      sustainable use (POF4-217)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:001157187200001},
      doi          = {10.1002/adsu.202300599},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1028709},
}